{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":2,"sheets":["Quality Evaluation","Sheet1"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Quality Evaluation","index":0,"n_rows":23,"n_cols":34,"rows_kept":23,"merged":[[6,2,6,15],[7,2,7,3],[7,4,7,5],[7,6,7,7],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[12,18,12,19],[12,22,12,23],[13,2,13,7],[13,18,13,19],[13,22,13,23],[14,2,14,7],[14,10,14,11],[14,14,14,15],[15,2,15,7],[15,10,15,11],[15,14,15,15],[16,2,16,7],[16,10,16,11],[16,14,16,15],[17,2,17,7],[17,10,17,11],[17,12,17,13],[17,14,17,15],[22,2,25,8],[22,10,22,11],[22,14,25,15],[23,10,23,11],[24,10,24,11],[25,10,25,11]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[{"$nulls":3},0,"Do Not Meet",{"$nulls":22},"MAX",null,"Not applicable",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0.49,"d":"49%"},"NOT MEET","0-49"]
[{"$nulls":3},1,"Partial Meet (large gap) ",{"$nulls":22},{"v":0,"d":"0%"},0,"Do Not Meet",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},{"v":0.59,"d":"59%"},"PARTIAL MEET","50-59"]
[{"$nulls":3},2,"Partial Meet (small gap)",{"$nulls":22},{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},1,"Partial Meet",{"v":0.6,"d":"60%"},{"v":0.69,"d":"69%"},"PARTIAL MEET","60-69"]
[{"$nulls":3},3,"Meet",{"$nulls":22},{"v":0.75,"d":"75%"},2,"Partial Meet",{"v":0.7,"d":"70%"},100,"MEET","70-100"]
[{"$nulls":27},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},3,"Meet"]
[{"$nulls":27},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},"X","Not applicable"]
[null,null," Annexure O: Quality Evaluation Criteria for Plant Enquiry No:WCKBG1122PMR -  The supply and delivery of six (6) module:monostable relay"]
[null,null,"Requirement",null,"Criteria",null,"Deliverable",null,"Weighting",null," Rating","% Rating","% Score",null,"[ Supplier Name ] Response","Eskom Comments"]
[null,null,"1. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM",null,"Quality Assurance Programme that meets the intent of a typical Quality management system (QMS) or as indicated on page 16 of 238-103.  ","The returnable is a document or method statement describing the supplier Quality Programme that provide a description of the processes and supporting information that reflects how processes are managed and work/operation is prepared, reviewed, carried out, recorded, assessed and improved . Examples of processes to be described can include Resource Selection, Quality Control, Receipt Inspection, Purchasing, etc.","Returnable is a document, SOP, flowchart or method statement describing the supplier Quality Programme that provide a description of the processes and supporting information that reflects how processes are managed and work / operation is prepared, reviewed, carried out, recorded, assessed and improved  . Examples of processes to be described can include Purchasing, Quality Control, Receipt Inspection, processes etc.",null,{"v":0.4,"d":"40%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[null,null,"2. QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM",null,"Demonstrate implementation of the methods used to inspect or monitor and evaluate the results to ensure conformity of products and services. ",null,"The returnable is the applicable process documents or method statement and records demonstrating implementation. Example of records to be submitted can include receipt inspection checklist,etc",null,{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"3. NONCONFORMING PRODUCT/SERVICE",null,"Demonstrate implementation of a Non-conformance process or procedure to meet the requirements of 238-103  Rev 2 section 3.4 and 3.5","Returnable is an example of a QCP or Quality Project Plan for a similar service or product, identifying sequential operations and indicating inspection and test points (hold and/or witness points) and areas where reports are required .","The returnable is the applicable process documents or method statement to demonstrate implementation of non-conformance, deviation and concession process, including disposition with provisions for customer notification and acceptance. Example of records to be submitted can include non-conformance report (NCR),deviation permits,concession application, etc",null,{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":3},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"$nulls":4},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[]
[null,null,"Final Analysis"]
[null,null,"1. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM",{"$nulls":5},{"v":0.4,"d":"40%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"},null,null,{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[null,null,"2. QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM",{"$nulls":5},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"3. NONCONFORMING PRODUCT/SERVICE",{"$nulls":5},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"TOTAL",{"$nulls":5},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"NOT RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"RE-EVALUATE",{"$nulls":6},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"},null,null,{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[]
[null,null,"The scoring of the Functional Evaluation is conducted as follows:\nA supplier is given a score in each of the sub-categories. These sub-categories are requirements detailed in the specification or contract. Scores are allocated as follows:\n0 - 0% -    Does not meet \n1 - 50% -  Large gap\n2 - 75%   - Small gap\n3 - 100% - Meet\nThe overall score for functionality criteria is  analysed as follows:\n0%     - 79%   - Does not meet\n80%   - 100% - Meet",{"$nulls":11},"Compiled by: Nobulali Mpengesi\n\n\nSignature:\n\n\nDate:"]

{"sheet":"Sheet1","index":1,"n_rows":0,"n_cols":0,"rows_kept":0,"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}