{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Phase a - Functional evaluation"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Phase a - Functional evaluation","index":0,"n_rows":64,"n_cols":35,"rows_kept":64,"merged":[[6,2,6,17],[7,8,7,14],[8,2,9,3],[8,10,8,12],[8,13,8,14],[9,10,9,12],[9,13,9,14],[10,2,10,3],[10,10,10,12],[10,13,10,14],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,18,3],[19,2,23,3],[24,2,34,3],[35,2,36,3],[38,2,48,3],[40,4,44,4],[45,4,47,4],[50,2,50,6],[51,2,51,6],[51,12,51,13],[51,16,51,17],[52,2,52,6],[52,12,52,13],[52,16,52,17],[53,2,53,6],[53,12,53,13],[53,16,53,17],[54,2,54,6],[54,12,54,13],[54,16,54,17],[55,2,55,6],[55,12,55,13],[55,16,55,17],[56,2,56,6],[56,12,56,13],[56,14,56,15],[56,16,56,17],[61,2,64,10],[61,12,61,13],[61,16,61,17],[62,12,62,13],[62,16,62,17],[63,12,63,13],[63,16,63,17],[64,12,64,13],[64,16,64,17]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[{"$nulls":3},0,"Do Not Meet",{"$nulls":13},"MAX",null,"Not applicable",null,0,"NOT MEET","0-49",{"$nulls":7},{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0.49,"d":"49%"},"NOT MEET"]
[{"$nulls":3},1,"Partial Meet (large gap) ",{"$nulls":13},0,0,"Does not meet ",0,0.5,"PARTIAL MEET","50-74",{"$nulls":7},{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},{"v":0.74,"d":"74%"},"PARTIAL MEET"]
[{"$nulls":3},2,"Partial Meet (small gap)",{"$nulls":13},0.5,1,"Partial meet (Large gap) ",0.7,0.75,"PARTIAL MEET","75-80",{"$nulls":7},{"v":0.75,"d":"75%"},{"v":0.79,"d":"79%"},"PARTIAL MEET"]
[{"$nulls":3},3,"Meet",{"$nulls":13},0.75,2,"Partial Meet (Small gap)",0.8,0.8,"MEET","80-100",{"$nulls":7},{"v":0.8,"d":"80%"},100,"MEET"]
[{"$nulls":18},1,3,"Meet ",1.01]
[{"$nulls":18},1,"X","Not applicable"]
[null,null,"Functional Evaluation Criteria for Enquiry No: WCKBG2410GGR - 10024 The replacement of Nuclear Sampling System (REN) Verdelet type 1 control valves"]
[{"$nulls":8},"Alternative Option - No Design"]
[null,null,"Mandatory Requirement",null,"Requirements",null,null,"Criteria ","Deliverables","Scoring Methodology","Yes",null,null,"No",null,null,"[ Supplier Name ] Response","Eskom Comments"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Valve Type - Primary System",null,null,"The Contractor shall provide a standard commercial grade, high pressure, direct operated, reducing regulator valve for the primary system sample lines, to be qualified to comply to the design base SSE/OBE seismic spectra.","Primary System high pressure reducing regulator, direct operated, commerical grade valves to be qualified to comply to the required design base SSE/OBE seismic spectra.","Yes - The offer provides primary system high pressure reducing regulator, direct operated, commercial grade valves, that shall be qualified to meet or exceed the design base SSE/OBE seismic spectra requirement.\nNo - The offer does not provide primary system high pressure reducing regulator, direct operated, commercial grade valves, that shall be qualified to meet or exceed the design base SSE/OBE seismic spectra requirement."]
[null,null,"Mandatory Requirement",null,"Quality Management System",null,null,"Demonstrate that the supplier Quality Management System (QMS) is certified to ISO 9001:2015, or equivalent and in compliance with ASME NQA-1, IAEA GS-R or equivalent.\nIf supplier QMS is not certified or in compliance, no further evaluation will be performed.","Copies of Management System Certification. ","Yes - QMS Certified and comply with ASME NQA-1, IAEA GS-R or equivalent.\nNo - QMS Not Certified and not comply"]
[]
[null,null,"Category",null,"Requirements",null,null,"Criteria ","Deliverables","Scoring Methodology","Weighting",null," Rating","% Rating","% Score",null,"[ Supplier Name ] Response","Eskom Comments"]
[null,null,"1. PREVIOUS PERFORMANCE",null,"Previous experience on Koeberg projects or any other similar projects at other Nuclear Power Stations","The structure needs to show the function areas from CEO/MD down to the site management and the roles each member plays in delivering the scope.","Provide organisational structure highlighting key positions and how they will interface with Employer","Lead / 2nd sub-contractor in >5 significant nuclear projects at Koeberg and/or other similar nuclear utilities (PWR).","List of significant nuclear projects at Koeberg / other similar nuclear utilities (i.e. PWR)","100% - Evidence submitted of involvement in > 5 nuclear projects\n75% - Evidence submitted of involvement in > 2 nuclear projects\n50% - Evidence submitted of involvement in any nuclear valve replacement project\n0% - No evidence submitted",{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Success of previous Koeberg projects and or any other similar projects at other Nuclear Power Stations",null,null,"Review of previous quality concerns, delays etc and response to these issues ","List of references of similar projects","100% - Feedback from previous projects - No quality concerns or delays\n75% - Feedback from previous projects - Some quality concerns or delays\n50% - Feedback from previous projects - Major quality concerns or delays\n0% - No feedback from previous projects ",{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Experience with similar (ASME III or RCC-M) nuclear industry projects including piping, welding, routing and fitment.",null,null,"Number of similar (ASME III or RCC-M) nuclear industry projects including piping, welding, routing and fitment.","List of similar (ASME III or RCC-M) nuclear industry projects including piping, welding, routing and fitment.","100% - List of similar nuclear industry projects including piping, welding, routing and fitment provided - involved in > 5 projects\n75% - List of similar nuclear industry projects including piping, welding, routing and fitment provided - involved in > 2 projects\n50% - List of similar nuclear industry projects including piping, welding, routing and fitment provided - involved in ≤ 2 projects\n0% - No list of similar nuclear industry projects including piping, welding, routing and fitment provided",{"v":0.2,"d":"20%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Experience with similar nuclear industry projects including working in electrical,  C&I and relaying design and installation with seismic considerations.",null,null,"Number with similar nuclear industry projects including working in electrical,  C&I and relaying design and installation with seismic considerations.","List with similar nuclear industry projects including working in electrical,  C&I and relaying design and installation with seismic considerations.","100% - List of similar nuclear industry projects including working in electrical,  C&I and relaying design and installation provided - involved in > 5 projects\n75% - List of similar nuclear industry projects including working in electrical,  C&I and relaying design and installation provided - involved in > 2 projects\n50% - List of similar nuclear industry projects including working in electrical,  C&I and relaying design and installation provided - involved in ≤ 2 projects\n0% - No list of similar nuclear industry projects including working in electrical,  C&I and relaying design and installation provided",{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Experience / qualification with fabrication under nuclear safety and quality management systems ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100","The supplier needs to have more than 5 years experience in similar projects.","Quantitative & practical experience of Company","ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 compliant and demonstration of experience","Provision of ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 certification and list of previous ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 work","100% -  ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 certification provided. List of previous ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 work provided - involved in > 5 projects\n75% - ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 certification provided. List of previous ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 work provided - involved in > 2 projects\n50% - ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 certification provided. List of previous ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 work provided - involved in ≤ 2 projects\n0% - No ASME NQA-1 or NSQ-100 certification provided",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":5},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"2. PROJECT TEAM STRENGTH",null,"Design engineers qualifications & experience with similar nuclear industry piping and valve system design and installation. ","CV's including references of previous experience of personnel who shall execute the scope","Appropriately qualified and skilled personnel","Professional Engineer / Technologist. Years of experience with with similar nuclear industry piping and valve system design and installation. ","Provision of brief CVs","100% - CV(s) provided.  Most experienced designer > 20 years experience\n75% - CV(s) provided.  Most experienced designer > 10 years experience\n50% - CV(s) provided.  Most experienced designer ≤ 10 years experience\n0% - No CV(s) provided.",{"v":0.4,"d":"40%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Installation Phase technicians / engineers qualifications & experience with similar work.",null,null,"Man-years of experience with similar nuclear industry piping and valve system design and installation projects. ","Provision of brief CVs","100% - CV(s) provided.  Most experienced installer > 10 years experience\n75% - CV(s) provided.  Most experienced installer > 5 years experience\n50% - CV(s) provided.  Most experienced installer ≤ 5 years experience\n0% - No CV(s) provided.",{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Project Manager experience",null,null,"Experience with similar sampling system pressure control valve related projects.","Provision of brief CVs","100% - CV provided.  Project manager > 15 years experience\n75% - CV provided.  Project manager > 10 years experience\n50% - CV provided.  Project manager ≤ 10 years experience\n0% - No CV provided.",{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Proposed pipe fitters, welders, safety and quality representastive qualification and skills.",null,null,"Number, qualifications and experience of proposed pipe fitters and welders.","Provision of brief CVs","100% - CV(s) provided.  Collective experience > 25 years experience\n75% - CV(s) provided.  Collective experience > 15 years experience\n50% - CV(s) provided.  Project experience ≤ 15 years experience\n0% - No CV(s) provided.",{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":5},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL ",null,"Meeting TRS requirements ","Technical specification showing that the device meets the criteria specified.",null,"Contractor's technical proposal meets TRS requirements ","Brief methodology statements in terms of how the tenderer is planning to meet the engineering, quality, manufacturing, installation and testing requirements specified in the TRS.","100% - All methodology statements provided - > 80% compliant\n75% - Some methodology statements provided - > 50% compliant\n50% - Some methodology statements provided - ≤ 50% compliant\n0% - No methodology statements provided",{"v":0.2,"d":"20%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Valve Type - Secondary System",null,null,"The Contractor shall provide a direct operated, high pressure reducing regulator.","Valve is of a direct operated, high pressure reducing regulator type i.e. not pneumatically operated.","Yes -Valve is of a direct operated, high pressure reducing regulator type.\nNo - Valve is not a direct operated, high pressure reducing regulator type.",{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Performance - REN 111 to 114 VP ",null,null,"Offer shall include a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability of  ≥172 bar, and outlet pressure control range of ≤8 bar.","Valve Datasheet from Manufacturer","Yes - Offer includes a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability of  ≥172 bar, and outlet pressure control range of ≤8 bar.\n\nNo - Offer does not include a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability of  ≥172 bar, and outlet pressure control range of ≤8 bar.",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Performance - REN 115 to 116 VP ",null,null,"Offer shall include a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability of  ≥9 bar, and outlet pressure control capability of ≤8 bar.","Valve Datasheet from Manufacturer","Yes - Offer includes a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability of  ≥9 bar, and outlet pressure control capability of ≤8 bar.\n\nNo - Offer does not include a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability of  ≥9 bar, and outlet pressure control capability of ≤8 bar.",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Performance - REN 241 to 244 and 250 VL ",null,null,"Offer shall include a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability  of  ≥14 bar, and outlet pressure control capability of ≤4 bar.","Valve Datasheet from Manufacturer","Yes - Offer includes a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability  of  ≥14 bar, and outlet pressure control capability of ≤4 bar.\n\nNo - Offer does not include a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability  of  ≥14 bar, and outlet pressure control capability of ≤4 bar.",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Performance - REN 281 to 283 VL ",null,null,"Offer shall include a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability of  ≥76 bar, and outlet pressure control capability of ≤4 bar.","Valve Datasheet from Manufacturer","Yes - Offer includes a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability  of  ≥76 bar, and outlet pressure control capability of ≤4 bar.\n\nNo - Offer does not include a valve design meeting the inlet pressure capability of  ≥76 bar, and outlet pressure control capability of ≤4 bar.",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Evidence of Application",null,null,"One example of successful use in the same application i.e. nuclear liquid and gas sampling of high pressure system.","Example, including location with description of application.","Yes - Example, including location with description of application.\nNo - Insufficient evidence in description of successful application, or application not similar to that described in project Technical Requirement Specification.",{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Installability",null,null,"Dimensions and mass of the valves offered are similar or smaller than the currently installed Verdelet valve and controller assembly.","Comparison table of proposed valve dimensions and weight vs existing valves dimensions weights.","Yes -Size and weight of new valves clearly shown and are smaller and lighter than existing valves.\nNo - Size and weight of new valves are not shown, or are larger and or heavier than exisiting valves.",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Document Quality ",null,null,"Quality of contractors technical proposal (clear, concise, professional, accurate etc) ","High quality technical proposal","100% - High quality technical proposal (binded hard copies, searchable soft copies, layout of information clear and concise)\n75% - Good quality technical proposal (stapled hard copies, non-searchable soft copies, layout of information less clear and concise)\n50% - Fair quality technical proposal (loose hard copies, non-searchable soft copies, layout of information somewhat confusing)\n0% - Bad quality technical proposal (loose hard copies in random order, no soft copies, layout of information very confusing)",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Operational Lifecycle Cost",null,null,"Cost to own and operate less than current valve pressure regulators and in-line with industry norm.","Maintenance program and spare list with prices.","100% - Maintenance program and spare list provided. Opex < R0.05M per annum\n75% - Maintenance program and spare list provided. Opex < R0.07M per annum\n50% - Maintenance program and spare list provided. Opex ≥ R0.09M per annum\n0% - No maintenance program and spare list provided. Opex ≥ R0.11M per annum ",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":5},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"4. PRELIMINARY PROGRAMME ",null,"Preliminary programme ","The project plan showing the delivery dates, analysis completion dates and turnaround time for report submission date.","Key milestone plan. Detailed proposed installation and retrieval plan. Plan from contract placement until delivery of the last Technical Report. The following proposed dates are provided and acceptable:\n- Contract Start and Completion dates.\n- Devices delivery dates from the Supplier to the Employer.\n- Devices retrieval from Controlled zones dates.\n- Exposed devices delivery dates to the Supplier's Laboratory.\n- Technical report first draft submission dates.\n- Technical report final copy submission dates. ","Materials delivery to site","Preliminary plan","100% - Preliminary plan showing delivery to site before start date of Koeberg installation planned date.\n75% - Preliminary plan showing delivery to site before start date of Koeberg installation planned date.\n50% - Preliminary plan showing delivery to site on or after start date of Koeberg installation planned date.\n0% - No preliminary plan.",{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Preliminary programme ",null,null,"Installation phase no impact on outage critical path (for all work in an outage)","Preliminary plan showing no impact on critical path and/or production","100% - Preliminary plan showing no impact on production or outage duration.\n50% - Preliminary plan showing possible impact on production or outage duration.\n0% - No preliminary plan",{"v":0.7,"d":"70%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":5},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"5. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME",null,"QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS)","The returnable is the supplier's  ISO 9001: 2015 certificate.","Demonstrate that the supplier Quality Management System (QMS) is certified to ISO 9001:2015.","Implementation of the quality management system.","Copy of latest internal audit reports or self-assessment or audit by external party (e.g. customer) to indicate implementation of the quality management system.",null,{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"QUALITY PLANNING",null,null,"Quality Control Plan (QCP) or Inspection and Test Plan (ITP)  or Quality Plan : A supplier document specifying the work or production activities to be performed throughout the execution of the product realization works inclusive of test methods, procedures and acceptance criteria.  (238-102 Rev2, Section 3.5 refers) ","Returnable is an example of a QCP or Quality Project Plan for a similar service or product. QCP shall have identifying sequential operations and indicating inspection and test points (hold and/or witness points) and areas where reports are required.",null,{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY",null,null,"Demonstrate management responsibility with respect to leadership: \n1: organisational structure to show roles,  reporting lines and authority.\n2: business plan, strategic direction, objectives, performance indicators and targets to show the level of performance is accomplished. \n","The returnable is the retained or maintained documented information for demonstrating criteria implementation.                                                                                                                    1: Organogram demonstrating key personnel with their roles                                                                                                                         2: KPI's and latest management review report.",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate that change control process is managed in the organization on areas such as the company structure, staffing levels and resources that can adversely affect quality.","The returnable is the retained documented information or records demonstrating criteria implementation, e.g. Changes have been planned and risk assessment performed to determine potential consequences and impact wrt the integrity of the QMS.",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate that measures exist to control internal and external interfaces to the organisation and that adequate oversight measures are implemented.  ","The returnable is the maintained documented information demonstrating criteria implementation.",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate that measures exist to control externally provided processes, products and service as well as that adequate oversight measures have been implemented.  ","The returnable is the maintained documented information demonstrating criteria implementation, e.g. process and criteria for the evaluation, selection, monitoring of performance, and re-evaluation of external providers as well as verification of purchased products and services.",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate management commitment and accountability with respect to the achievement of QMS objectives.   Provide evidence  that the management review process ensures that the Quality Management System is suitable and effective with respect  to quality.","The returnable is the latest management review report.",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"MONITORING",null,null,"Demonstrate implementation of reviews to measure process effectiveness and opportunities for improvement with respect to quality management. ","The returnable is the retained (record) documented information demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. Internal and or external audit or self assessment report.",null,{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate implementation of non-conformance, deviation and concession process, including disposition with provisions for customer notification and acceptance. ","The returnable is the retained (record) documented information  demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. Non-conformance and deviation reports.",null,{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate that adequate measures are in place to ensure that audit results and corrective actions are being resolved satisfactorily and are closed out within agreed timeline. ","The returnable is the retained (record) documented information   demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. A corrective action plan accomplished (closed-out) as scheduled. ",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":10},{"v":1.0000000000000002,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[]
[null,null,"Final Analysis"]
[null,null,"1. PREVIOUS PERFORMANCE",{"$nulls":7},{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"2. PROJECT TEAM STRENGTH",{"$nulls":7},{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL ",{"$nulls":7},{"v":0.35,"d":"35%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"4. PRELIMINARY PROGRAMME ",{"$nulls":7},{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"5. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME",{"$nulls":7},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"TOTAL",{"$nulls":7},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"NOT RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"RE-EVALUATE",{"$nulls":8},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"},null,null,{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[]
[null,null,"The scoring of the Quality Evaluation Criteria is conducted as follows:\nA supplier is given a score in each of the sub-categories. These sub-categories are requirements detailed in the specification or contract. Scores are allocated as follows:\n0 - 0% -    Does not meet \n1 - 50% -  Partial meet (Large gap) \n2 - 75% - Partial Meet (Small gap)\n3- 100% - Meet                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          The overall score for functionality criteria is  analysed as follows:\n0%     - 79%   - Does not meet\n80%   - 100% - Meet\n                                                                                   ",{"$nulls":9},"NOT MEET",{"$nulls":3},"COMPILER TECHNICAL :  EVAN KERR\n\nSIGNATURE:"]
[{"$nulls":16},"COMPILER QUALITY:   PHINDIWE XOTYENI\n\nSIGNATURE:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  "]
[{"$nulls":16},"REVIEWER: \n\nSIGNATURE:",{"$nulls":5},"`"]