{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":3,"sheets":["Annexure B1- Tactical & Tender","Annexure B2 - Contr. Mngt","Annexure B3 - Demand & Sourcing"],"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Annexure B1- Tactical & Tender","index":0,"n_rows":35,"n_cols":6,"rows_kept":35,"merged":[[1,1,1,4],[4,0,13,0],[4,1,13,1],[14,0,25,0],[14,1,25,1],[14,2,15,2],[14,3,15,3],[14,4,15,4],[14,5,15,5],[16,2,20,2],[21,2,25,2],[27,0,30,0],[27,1,30,1],[27,2,30,2],[27,3,30,3],[27,4,30,4],[27,5,30,5]]}
[]
[null,"ANNEXURE B1 - TECHNICAL EVALUATION - TACTICAL PROCUREMENT & TENDER MANAGEMENT"]
[]
[null,"Requirements","Provide Evidence /Supporting Documents and Include as an Appendix to this Annexure and indicate reference hereunder ","Scoring Guide and Points","Maximum Points Achievable","PROOF OF EVIDENCE REFERENCED (clear reference to applicable section in appendix, included documentation)"]
["A","Solution Design \n","Single Sign-On (SSO)\nIntegrate with Microsoft Active Directory for Single Sign-On. \n\nProvide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Application Architecture and Logical Security Architecture Design Diagrams. \n","1. Provided evidence of integration with Microsoft Active Directory (2 point) \n2. Provided evidence of integration with Microsoft Active Directory, with Single Sign-On (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n\n\n\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Concurrent Usage\nAllow multiple users to log in at the same time\n\nThe bidder's proposed solution allows for 5000 or more users to log in at the same time. Evidence may be in the form of screenshots of active users, User parameters","1. Provided evidence of log-in of multiple users at the time functions (2 point)\n2. Provided evidence of the functionality to have more than 5000 users login at the same time  (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Integration Architecture: System Integration/Interface\nIntegrate proposed solution into Transnet application landscape through Remote Function Calls (RFCs),  Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), etc.\n\nAs evidence, provide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Integration Architecture Design Diagrams. ","1. Provided evidence of integration capability via  point to point integration, built-in ESB or Message Queues and an API layer for all main functions (2 point)\n2. Provided designs of Integration/API (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Data Architecture\nDeploy on premise (include Operating System and Database compatibility) and cloud deployment\n\nProvide detailed description of Logical Technical Architecture and Logical Network Architecture Design Diagrams, including how backups, back up restoration tests, replication for Disaster Recovery (DR) including DR tests will be achieved. ","\n1. On-premise deployment ability and deployment ability as SaaS / PaaS (2 point)\n2. Capability for backups (2 point)\n3. Capability for back up restoration tests (2 point)\n4. Capability for Replication for Disaster Recovery (DR) including DR tests (2 point)\n5. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":8,"d":"8.00"}]
[null,null,"Application Architecture: Mobility\nDeliver solution functionality via mobile App.  \n\nAs evidence, provide list of mobile operating systems supported (Android, iOS, Windows). Evidence may be in the form of screenshots of mobile functionality or capability to downloads from App Stores.\n","\n1. Deliver functionality via a mobile App for Android (1 point)\n2. Deliver functionality via a mobile App for iOS (1 point)\n3. Deliver functionality via a mobile App for Windows (2 point)\n4. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Application Architecture: Audibility\nAudit trails exist for all transactions taking place on the bidder's proposed solution\n\nEvidence in may be in the form of documentation, change logs before and after.","\n1. Provided evidence of audit trail exists for system transactions (2 point)\n2. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[null,null,"User Permissions\nAssign end user permissions via groups, roles or structures. \n\nAs evidence, provide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Application Architecture and Logical Security Architecture Design Diagrams and proposed role profiles.","\n1. Provided evidence of ability to assign end user permissions via groups, roles or structures.  (2 point)\n2. Support for multi-level access control(by application, function/feature, data domain, field group or field). (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Security Domains\nSecurity protocols in place to safeguard against unauthorized access. \n\nAs evidence, provide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Application Architecture and Logical Security Architecture Design Diagrams and proposed role profiles.","\n1. Provided sufficient evidence of security controls that are embedded in the system to reduce the risk of a cyber-attack. (1 point)\n2. Provided sufficient evidence that the solution has the capability to support for multi-level access control (by application, function/feature, data domain, field group or field). (1 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[null,null,"Application Architecture: System Performance for the each Module\nCapabilities and qualities to enable each module Management end-to-end process. \n\nAs evidence, provide a detailed document indicating how the bidder's proposed solution will enable the key features of each module (End-to-End) including detailed Logical Application Architecture and System Architecture Design Diagrams","\n1. Provided evidence of executing of the Demand Management with detailed process flow from start to end (4 point)\n1.1 Provided partial execution of Demand Management process flow from start to end (3 point)\n1.2 No information provided and/or irrelevant information provided (0 point)\n2. Partial points will be allocated based on the bidder's response. Bidders will score 0 points if No information provided and/or irrelevant information provided.\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Data Architecture: Business Intelligence & Reporting (Track & Trace)\nThe bidder's proposed solution allows for real-time/near real-time performance monitoring of transactions, processes and workflow. Standard reports exist in the bidder's proposed solution, End-users can configure their own reports and Transnet has access to data to build customized reports and data can be exported from the system.\n\nAs evidence, provide a detailed documentation highlighting analytical reporting capabilities to promote data driven decision making.","\n1. Provided evidence of detailed real-time/near real-time performance monitoring, standard reports exists, and end-users can configure their own reports via self-service capabilities (1 point)\n2. Provided evidence of configurable reports Transnet can also build customized reports (1 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
["B","Solution Functionality\n","User Interface/Experience and Scalability of the Tactical Procurement and Tender Management Modules","User Interface/Experience and Scalability \n1. User Interface: Responsive - under 200ms user responsiveness time for 90% of interactions. Evidence in the form of  load times from different browser, screenshots or documents   (1 point)\n2. User Experience- user friction - Layout for a procurement solution, use of whitespace, use of appropriate UI design patterns. Evidence in the graphics user interface design and/or screenshot (1 point)\n3. User environment Journey mapping, customer experience analysis to ensure positive experience. Evidence in the form of flow diagrams or blueprint designs  (1 point)\n4. Provide previous/current detailed functional processes and process maps of the software workflows. Evidence in the form process map and/or workflow, graphic or screenshot   (1 point)\n5. Previous/current Internal Users Interface designs e.g. for (Buyers) . Evidence in the form of screenshot (1 point)\n6.  Previous/current External Users Interface designs e.g. for (External Users): Evidence in the form of screenshot(s)  (1 point)\n7. Ability to upload- readable excel files, that can auto populate key fields. Evidence in the form of documentation or screenshot  (1 point) \n8.Ability to read, edit, sign, generate, extract data from PDFs, Excel, Word, PowerPoint. Evidence in the form of documentation or screenshot (1 point)\n9. Availability of standardised modules. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set  (1 point)\n10. Flexibility of customisation of modules. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set  (1 point)\n11. Low/Code and No code customisation tools, that can allow for further internal customisation based on changing environment. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set (2 point)\n12. Scalability to Handle large Transaction volumes (50k internal users, 1M external users, loading, downloading multiple files, 5000 simultaneous/concurrent users. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set (2 point)\n\n13. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":14,"d":"14.00"}]
[]
[null,null,"Tactical Procurement"," Ability to develop progress trackers that can show entire end to end procurement process. Evidence in the form of previous trackers built screenshots (2 point)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to show catalogues for bidders to upload, and buyers to view and select items for purchase. Evidence in the form of previously built catalogue screenshots/documents   (2 point)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to enable workflow automation of approval or Release Strategy - linked to Delegation of Authority (DoA). Evidence of previous workflow design documentation (1 point)",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Documents to be linkable, viewable, access traceable, archivable, integrated and log-able. Evidence in the form of screenshot and/or documentation   (1 point)",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to integrate with other systems for Goods Receipts and Invoice Creation processes, based on same Purchase Order generated in the solution. Evidence in the form of screenshot and/or documentation   (1 point)",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"}]
[null,null,"Tender Management","Ability to restrict access bids after closure of bid submissions and allow access to bid responses after bid closure to delegated stakeholders. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots   (2 point)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to send automatic replies to bidders who submitted their bids after the set bid deadline. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots  (2 point)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to interface with external agencies. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots  (1 point)",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to generate Letters of Award, Letters of Intent, Letter of Regret, etc. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots  (1 point)",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to kick start handover process from Procurement to Contract Management process upon issuing of Letter of Award (LoA). As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots  (1 point)",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"}]
["C","Bidder's Experience -\n(Reference Letters)","Bidder provided relevant client references in the company letter from  clients who are/were currently using the software solution for automation of Tactical Procurement and Tender Management. The following minimum verifiable information has been provided (company name, contact person, contact details and confirmation of the services rendered relevant to the  Procurement Process Automation/Digitalization in the reference letter)\n\nTransnet reserves the right to contact the clients listed in order to verify the information provided.\n\nNote: For bidders that were subcontracting to other companies, a letter of reference from the main company (company with the client contract) or copy of contract between main company and subcontracting company, as proof that such subcontracting did exist. Transnet reserves the right to confirm / verify any such subcontracting agreements). Reference letter or contract must not be older than 5 years (i.e. July 2018). If the reference letter or contract is older than 5 years, is not dated, is not on a client’s letterhead, is not signed, or does not have client contact details, it shall not be considered as valid. \n","One (1) relevant reference letters not older than July 2018 (i.e. 5 years) from clients on the services rendered specific to Tactical Procurement and Tender Management. The reference letter with the following minimum information (company letterhead, company name, contact person, contact details and relevant description of services to Transnet scope of work)\n1. Relevant client Reference Letter 1 (10 point)\n\n2. Partial completion (i.e. missing information) on the letter may render the reference as non-responsive. Irrelevant description or insufficient information provided on description of services will render the letter as non-responsive. There are no partial points for allocation for reference letter. Bidder will score (0) points for each letter if the minimum requirements are not met,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":10,"d":"10.00"}]
["D","Bidder's Experience)","Bidder must provide a summary report of the most recent project completed not older than July 2018 (i.e. 5 years) within software development and/or  integration and/or  customisation and/or implementation experience in Supply Chain Management /Procurement and/or Process Automation relevant and/or similar specific to Tactical Procurement and Tender Management.  The summary report must not be more than 2000 words detailing the following:\n1. The client details (company name, contact person, contact number, email address)\n2. Date of assignment and current % completion and implementation of the project\n3. Problem statement\n4. Key project Deliverables \n5. Suppliers Project Approach\n6. Challenges, Risks, Issues, Lessons Learnt during the project\n7. Screenshots of the solution / use case with explanation of the functionality\n8. Improvements since completion and implementation of the project\n\nNote: For bidders that were subcontracting to other companies, a letter of reference from the main company (company with the client contract) or copy of contract between main company and subcontracting company, as proof that such subcontracting did exist, this must be included together with the summary report (refer to Appendix 2)where applicable for ease of reference. Transnet reserves the right to confirm / verify any such subcontracting agreements). Reference letter or contract must not be older than 5 years (i.e. July 2018). If the reference letter or contract is older than 5 years, is not dated, is not on a client’s letterhead, is not signed, or does not have client contact details, it shall not be considered as valid.\n","One detailed Summary Report for the provision of Procurement Process Automation completed specific to Tactical Procurement and Tender Management. The Summary Report contains the following minimum information:\n\nSummary Report (Refer to Appendix 2)\n1. The client details (company name, contact person, contact number, email address) (Mandatory Information, bidder will score 0 points if this information is not provided)\n2. Date of assignment and current % completion and implementation of the project (2 point)\n3. Problem statement (2 point)\n4. Key project deliverables (2 point)\n5. Suppliers Project Approach (1 point)\n6. Challenges, Risks, Issues, Lessons Learnt during the project (1 point)\n7. Screenshots of the solution / use case with explanation of the functionality (2 point)\n8. Improvements since completion and implementation of the project (2 point)\n\n9. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n",{"v":12,"d":"12.00"}]
[]
[]
[]
["E","Project Methodology, Approach and Implementation Plan","Detailed agile project methodology and plan outlining the key phases, milestones, deliverables, and key activities with timelines for the implementation of the Procurement solution for Tactical Procurement and Tender Management. As evidence, provide a clear illustration of the roll-out / deployment approach.","Project Methodology, approach and implementation plan with all activities including but not to in no particular order:\n1. Schedule with key activities and milestones (2 point)\n2. Resources (4 point)\n3. Roles & responsibilities (2 point)\n4. Tools, Techniques and Performance Measures (2 point)\n5. Other critical plans (i.e. including but not limited to Risk, Communication, HR, Quality & Cost Management) (2 point)\n6. Proposed Implementation plan will be delivered within targeted timelines (2 point)\n\n7. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":14,"d":"14.00"}]
["F","Project Team","Bidder provided an Organogram / Structure of the Key personnel/Staff/Team that will be assigned to the Transnet project for the automation of the Tactical Procurement and Tender Management modules. The information provided include:\n1. Project/Programme Manager\n2. Core team to the project comprising of 3 - 7 personnel. Expertise required include but not limited to: Developer, Solution Architect, Test Specialist,  SAP Consultant & Information Security Engineer, Supply Chain Management\n3. The Project/Programme Manager and core team must each have more than 5 years of relevant experience\n4. Role and Responsibilities of each of the team members \n4. Number of hours of involvement of the team members to the project for the specific module ","\n1. Organogram / Structure of the  Project/ Programme Manager and a core team comprising of 3-7 resources that will be assigned to Transnet for the automation of the Tactical Procurement and Tender Management modules (3 point)\n2. 5 years relevant experience of each core team member (2 point)\n3. Expertise in the core team include at least Developer, Solution Architect & SAP Consultant (2 point)\n3. Qualifications of at least 3 core team members have   tertiary qualifications in IT/Computer Science or related qualifications (2 point)\n3. Roles and Responsibilities of each team member (3 point). \n\n4. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":12,"d":"12.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Total Points",{"$f":"SUM(E5:E33)","v":{"v":114,"d":"114.00"}}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Minimum Threshold",{"$f":"E34*0.75","v":{"v":85.5,"d":"85.50"}}]

{"sheet":"Annexure B2 - Contr. Mngt","index":1,"n_rows":33,"n_cols":6,"rows_kept":33,"merged":[[1,1,1,4],[4,0,13,0],[4,1,13,1],[14,0,23,0],[14,1,23,1],[14,2,15,2],[14,3,15,3],[14,4,15,4],[16,2,23,2],[25,0,28,0],[25,1,28,1],[25,2,28,2],[25,3,28,3],[25,4,28,4],[25,5,28,5]]}
[]
[null,"ANNEXURE B2 - TECHNICAL EVALUATION - CONTRACT MANAGEMENT"]
[]
[null,"Requirements","Provide Evidence /Supporting Documents and Include as an Appendix to this Annexure and indicate reference hereunder ","Scoring Guide and Points","Maximum Points Achievable","PROOF OF EVIDENCE REFERENCED (clear reference to applicable section in appendix, included documentation)"]
["A","Solution Design \n","Single Sign-On (SSO)\nIntegrate with Microsoft Active Directory for Single Sign-On. \n\nProvide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Application Architecture and Logical Security Architecture Design Diagrams. \n","1. Provided evidence of integration with Microsoft Active Directory (2 point) \n2. Provided evidence of integration with Microsoft Active Directory, with Single Sign-On (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n\n\n\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Concurrent Usage\nAllow multiple users to log in at the same time\n\nThe bidder's proposed solution allows for 5000 or more users to log in at the same time.","1. Provided evidence of log-in of multiple users at the time functions (2 point)\n2. Provided evidence of the functionality to have more than 5000 users login at the same time  (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Integration Architecture: System Integration/Interface\nIntegrate proposed solution into Transnet application landscape through Remote Function Calls (RFCs),  Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), etc.\n\nAs evidence, provide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Integration Architecture Design Diagrams. ","1. Provided evidence of integration capability via  point to point integration, built-in ESB or Message Queues and an API layer for all main functions (2 point)\n2. Provided designs of Integration/API (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Data Architecture\nDeploy on premise (include Operating System and Database compatibility) and cloud deployment\n\nProvide detailed description of Logical Technical Architecture and Logical Network Architecture Design Diagrams, including how backups, back up restoration tests, replication for Disaster Recovery (DR) including DR tests will be achieved. ","\n1. On-premise deployment ability and deployment ability as SaaS / PaaS (2 point)\n2. Capability for backups (2 point)\n3. Capability for back up restoration tests (2 point)\n4. Capability for Replication for Disaster Recovery (DR) including DR tests (2 point)\n5. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":8,"d":"8.00"}]
[null,null,"Application Architecture: Mobility\nDeliver solution functionality via mobile App.  \n\nAs evidence, provide list of mobile operating systems supported (Android, iOS, Windows). \n","\n1. Deliver functionality via a mobile App for Android (1 point)\n2. Deliver functionality via a mobile App for iOS (1 point)\n3. Deliver functionality via a mobile App for Windows (2 point)\n4. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Application Architecture: Audibility\nAudit trails exist for all transactions taking place on the bidder's proposed solution","\n1. Provided evidence of audit trail exists for system transactions (2 point)\n2. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[null,null,"User Permissions\nAssign end user permissions via groups, roles or structures. \n\nAs evidence, provide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Application Architecture and Logical Security Architecture Design Diagrams and proposed role profiles.","\n1. Provided evidence of ability to assign end user permissions via groups, roles or structures.  (2 point)\n2. Support for multi-level access control(by application, function/feature, data domain, field group or field). (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Security Domains\nSecurity protocols in place to safeguard against unauthorized access. \n\nAs evidence, provide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Application Architecture and Logical Security Architecture Design Diagrams and proposed role profiles.","\n1. Provided sufficient evidence of security controls that are embedded in the system to reduce the risk of a cyber-attack. (1 point)\n2. Provided sufficient evidence that the solution has the capability to support for multi-level access control (by application, function/feature, data domain, field group or field). (1 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[null,null,"Application Architecture: System Performance for the each Module\nCapabilities and qualities to enable each module Management end-to-end process. \n\nAs evidence, provide a detailed document indicating how the bidder's proposed solution will enable the key features of each module (End-to-End) including detailed Logical Application Architecture and System Architecture Design Diagrams","\n1. Provided evidence of executing of the Demand Management with detailed process flow from start to end (4 point)\n1.1 Provided partial execution of Demand Management process flow from start to end (3 point)\n1.2 No information provided and/or irrelevant information provided (0 point)\n2. Partial points will be allocated based on the bidder's response. Bidders will score 0 points if No information provided and/or irrelevant information provided.\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Data Architecture: Business Intelligence & Reporting (Track & Trace)\nThe bidder's proposed solution allows for real-time/near real-time performance monitoring of transactions, processes and workflow. Standard reports exist in the bidder's proposed solution, End-users can configure their own reports and Transnet has access to data to build customized reports and data can be exported from the system.","\n1. Provided evidence of detailed real-time/near real-time performance monitoring, standard reports exists, and end-users can configure their own reports via self-service capabilities (1 point)\n2. Provided evidence of configurable reports Transnet can also build customized reports (1 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
["B","Solution Functionality\n","User Interface/Experience and Scalability of the Contract Management Module","\n1. User Interface: Responsive - under 200ms user responsiveness time for 90% of interactions. Evidence in the form of  load times from different browser, screenshots or documents   (1 point)\n2. User Experience- user friction - Layout for a procurement solution, use of whitespace, use of appropriate UI design patterns. Evidence in the graphics user interface design and/or screenshot (1 point)\n3. User environment Journey mapping, customer experience analysis to ensure positive experience. Evidence in the form of flow diagrams or blueprint designs  (1 point)\n4. Provide previous/current detailed functional processes and process maps of the software workflows. Evidence in the form process map and/or workflow, graphic or screenshot   (1 point)\n5. Previous/current Internal Users Interface designs e.g. for (Buyers) . Evidence in the form of screenshot (1 point)\n6.  Previous/current External Users Interface designs e.g. for (External Users): Evidence in the form of screenshot(s)  (1 point)\n7. Ability to upload- readable excel files, that can auto populate key fields. Evidence in the form of documentation or screenshot  (1 point) \n8.Ability to read, edit, sign, generate, extract data from PDFs, Excel, Word, PowerPoint. Evidence in the form of documentation or screenshot (1 point)\n9. Availability of standardised modules. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set  (1 point)\n10. Flexibility of customisation of modules. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set  (1 point)\n11. Low/Code and No code customisation tools, that can allow for further internal customisation based on changing environment. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set (2 point)\n12. Scalability to Handle large Transaction volumes (50k internal users, 1M external users, loading, downloading multiple files, 5000 simultaneous/concurrent users. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set (2 point)\n\n13. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":14,"d":"14.00"}]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to create system contract against the reference/project number. Evidence in the form of document and/or screenshot (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3}," Ability to create Contract Agreement. Evidence in the form of document and/or screenshot (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to automate Contract Agreement sign-off, whilst also catering for manual sign-off. Evidence in the form of document and/or screenshot and/or designs (1 point)",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to enable early warning alert when contract usage is at 50%, based on time, value, quantity, etc. System must also enable alerts on contract extensions.  Evidence in the form of document and/or screenshot and/or designs (1 point)",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to link all requisitions of goods and services and deplete funds from the budget and contract. Evidence in the form of document and/or screenshot and/or designs (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to alert contract stakeholders (owner, collaborators, etc.) of contract expiry, at least 6 to 12 months beforehand. Evidence in the form of document and/or screenshot and/or designs (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Ability to create Framework Contracts, with multiple thresholds, for Panels of Service Providers. Evidence in the form of document and/or screenshot and/or designs (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Allow for workflow automation of approval or sign-off of contracts. Evidence in the form of document and/or screenshot and/or designs (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
["C","Bidder's Experience -\n(Reference Letters)","Bidder provided relevant client references in the company letter from  clients who are/were currently using the software solution for automation of Contract Management. The following minimum verifiable information has been provided (company name, contact person, contact details and confirmation of the services rendered relevant to the  Procurement Process Automation/Digitalisation in the reference letter)\n\nTransnet reserves the right to contact the clients listed in order to verify the information provided.\n\nNote: For bidders that were subcontracting to other companies, a letter of reference from the main company (company with the client contract) or copy of contract between main company and subcontracting company, as proof that such subcontracting did exist. Transnet reserves the right to confirm / verify any such subcontracting agreements). Reference letter or contract must not be older than 5 years (i.e. July 2018). If the reference letter or contract is older than 5 years, is not dated, is not on a client’s letterhead, is not signed, or does not have client contact details, it shall not be considered as valid. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","One (1) relevant reference letters not older than July 2018 (i.e. 5 years) from clients on the services rendered automation of Contract Management. The reference letter with the following minimum information (company letterhead, company name, contact person, contact details and relevant description of services to Transnet scope of work)\n1. Relevant client Reference Letter 1 (10 point)\n\n2. Partial completion (i.e. missing information) on the letter may render the reference as non-responsive. Irrelevant description or insufficient information provided on description of services will render the letter as non-responsive. There are no partial points for allocation for reference letter. Bidder will score (0) points for each letter if the minimum requirements are not met,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":10,"d":"10.00"}]
["D","Bidder's Experience)","Bidder must provide a summary report of the most recent project completed not older than July 2018 (i.e. 5 years) within software development and/or  integration and/or  customisation and/or implementation experience in Supply Chain Management /Procurement and/or Process Automation relevant and/or similar specific to Contract Management.  The summary report must not be more than 2000 words detailing the following:\n1. The client details (company name, contact person, contact number, email address)\n2. Date of assignment and current % completion and implementation of the project\n3. Problem statement\n4. Key project Deliverables \n5. Suppliers Project Approach\n6. Challenges, Risks, Issues, Lessons Learnt during the project\n7. Screenshots of the solution / use case with explanation of the functionality\n8. Improvements since completion and implementation of the project\n\nNote: For bidders that were subcontracting to other companies, a letter of reference from the main company (company with the client contract) or copy of contract between main company and subcontracting company, as proof that such subcontracting did exist, this must be included together with the summary report where applicable for ease of reference. Transnet reserves the right to confirm / verify any such subcontracting agreements). Reference letter or contract must not be older than 5 years (i.e. July 2018). If the reference letter or contract is older than 5 years, is not dated, is not on a client’s letterhead, is not signed, or does not have client contact details, it shall not be considered as valid.\n","One detailed Summary Report for the provision of Procurement Process Automation completed specific to Tactical Procurement and Tender Management. The Summary Report contains the following minimum information:\n\nSummary Report \n1. The client details (company name, contact person, contact number, email address) (Mandatory Information, bidder will score 0 points if this information is not provided)\n2. Date of assignment and current % completion and implementation of the project (2 point)\n3. Problem statement (2 point)\n4. Key project deliverables (2 point)\n5. Suppliers Project Approach (1 point)\n6. Challenges, Risks, Issues, Lessons Learnt during the project (1 point)\n7. Screenshots of the solution / use case with explanation of the functionality (2 point)\n8. Improvements since completion and implementation of the project (2 point)\n\n9. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n",{"v":12,"d":"12.00"}]
[]
[]
[]
["E","Project Methodology, Approach and Implementation Plan","Detailed agile project methodology and plan outlining the key phases, milestones, deliverables, and key activities with timelines for the implementation of the Procurement solution for Contract Management. As evidence, provide a clear illustration of the roll-out / deployment approach.","Project Methodology, approach and implementation plan with all activities including but not to in no particular order:\n1. Schedule with key activities and milestones (2 point)\n2. Resources (4 point)\n3. Roles & responsibilities (2 point)\n4. Tools, Techniques and Performance Measures (2 point)\n5. Other critical plans (i.e. including but not limited to Risk, Communication, HR, Quality & Cost Management) (2 point)\n6. Proposed Implementation plan will be delivered within targeted timelines (2 point)\n\n7. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":14,"d":"14.00"}]
["F","Project Team","Bidder provided an Organogram / Structure of the Key personnel/Staff/Team that will be assigned to the Transnet project for the automation of Contract Management module. The information provided include:\n1. Project/Programme Manager\n2. Core team to the project comprising of 3 - 7 personnel. Expertise required include but not limited to: Developer, Solution Architect, Test Specialist,  SAP Consultant & Information Security Engineer, Supply Chain Management\n3. The Project/Programme Manager and core team must each have more than 5 years of relevant experience\n4. Role and Responsibilities of each of the team members \n4. Number of hours of involvement of the team members to the project for the specific module ","\n1. Organogram / Structure of the  Project/ Programme Manager and a core team comprising of 3-7 resources that will be assigned to Transnet for the automation of Contract Management module (3 point)\n2. 5 years relevant experience of each core team member (2 point)\n3. Expertise in the core team include at least Developer, Solution Architect & SAP Consultant (2 point)\n3. Qualifications of at least 3 core team members have   tertiary qualifications in IT/Computer Science or related qualifications (2 point)\n3. Roles and Responsibilities of each team member (3 point). \n\n4. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":12,"d":"12.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Total Points",{"$f":"SUM(E5:E31)","v":{"v":114,"d":"114.00"}}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Minimum Threshold",{"$f":"E32*0.75","v":{"v":85.5,"d":"85.50"}}]

{"sheet":"Annexure B3 - Demand & Sourcing","index":2,"n_rows":36,"n_cols":6,"rows_kept":36,"merged":[[1,1,1,5],[4,0,13,0],[4,1,13,1],[14,0,26,0],[14,1,26,1],[14,2,15,2],[14,3,15,3],[14,4,15,4],[16,2,20,2],[21,2,26,2],[28,0,31,0],[28,1,31,1],[28,2,31,2],[28,3,31,3],[28,4,31,4]]}
[]
[null,"ANNEXURE B3 - TECHNICAL EVALUATION - DEMAND MANAGEMENT & STRATEGIC SOURCING"]
[]
[null,"Requirements","Provide Evidence /Supporting Documents and Include as an Appendix to this Annexure and indicate reference hereunder ","Scoring Guide and Points","Maximum Points Achievable","PROOF OF EVIDENCE REFERENCED (clear reference to applicable section in appendix, included documentation)"]
["A","Solution Design \n","Single Sign-On (SSO)\nIntegrate with Microsoft Active Directory for Single Sign-On. \n\nProvide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Application Architecture and Logical Security Architecture Design Diagrams. \n","1. Provided evidence of integration with Microsoft Active Directory (2 point) \n2. Provided evidence of integration with Microsoft Active Directory, with Single Sign-On (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n\n\n\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Concurrent Usage\nAllow multiple users to log in at the same time\n\nThe bidder's proposed solution allows for 5000 or more users to log in at the same time.","1. Provided evidence of log-in of multiple users at the time functions (2 point)\n2. Provided evidence of the functionality to have more than 5000 users login at the same time  (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Integration Architecture: System Integration/Interface\nIntegrate proposed solution into Transnet application landscape through Remote Function Calls (RFCs),  Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), etc.\n\nAs evidence, provide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Integration Architecture Design Diagrams. ","1. Provided evidence of integration capability via  point to point integration, built-in ESB or Message Queues and an API layer for all main functions (2 point)\n2. Provided designs of Integration/API (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Data Architecture\nDeploy on premise (include Operating System and Database compatibility) and cloud deployment\n\nProvide detailed description of Logical Technical Architecture and Logical Network Architecture Design Diagrams, including how backups, back up restoration tests, replication for Disaster Recovery (DR) including DR tests will be achieved. ","\n1. On-premise deployment ability and deployment ability as SaaS / PaaS (2 point)\n2. Capability for backups (2 point)\n3. Capability for back up restoration tests (2 point)\n4. Capability for Replication for Disaster Recovery (DR) including DR tests (2 point)\n5. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":8,"d":"8.00"}]
[null,null,"Application Architecture: Mobility\nDeliver solution functionality via mobile App.  \n\nAs evidence, provide list of mobile operating systems supported (Android, iOS, Windows). \n","\n1. Deliver functionality via a mobile App for Android (1 point)\n2. Deliver functionality via a mobile App for iOS (1 point)\n3. Deliver functionality via a mobile App for Windows (2 point)\n4. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Application Architecture: Audibility\nAudit trails exist for all transactions taking place on the bidder's proposed solution","\n1. Provided evidence of audit trail exists for system transactions (2 point)\n2. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[null,null,"User Permissions\nAssign end user permissions via groups, roles or structures. \n\nAs evidence, provide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Application Architecture and Logical Security Architecture Design Diagrams and proposed role profiles.","\n1. Provided evidence of ability to assign end user permissions via groups, roles or structures.  (2 point)\n2. Support for multi-level access control(by application, function/feature, data domain, field group or field). (2 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Security Domains\nSecurity protocols in place to safeguard against unauthorized access. \n\nAs evidence, provide comprehensive description including detailed Logical Application Architecture and Logical Security Architecture Design Diagrams and proposed role profiles.","\n1. Provided sufficient evidence of security controls that are embedded in the system to reduce the risk of a cyber-attack. (1 point)\n2. Provided sufficient evidence that the solution has the capability to support for multi-level access control (by application, function/feature, data domain, field group or field). (1 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[null,null,"Application Architecture: System Performance for the each Module\nCapabilities and qualities to enable each module Management end-to-end process. \n\nAs evidence, provide a detailed document indicating how the bidder's proposed solution will enable the key features of each module (End-to-End) including detailed Logical Application Architecture and System Architecture Design Diagrams","\n1. Provided evidence of executing of the Demand Management with detailed process flow from start to end (4 point)\n1.1 Provided partial execution of Demand Management process flow from start to end (3 point)\n1.2 No information provided and/or irrelevant information provided (0 point)\n2. Partial points will be allocated based on the bidder's response. Bidders will score 0 points if No information provided and/or irrelevant information provided.\n",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[null,null,"Data Architecture: Business Intelligence & Reporting (Track & Trace)\nThe bidder's proposed solution allows for real-time/near real-time performance monitoring of transactions, processes and workflow. Standard reports exist in the bidder's proposed solution, End-users can configure their own reports and Transnet has access to data to build customized reports and data can be exported from the system.","\n1. Provided evidence of detailed real-time/near real-time performance monitoring, standard reports exists, and end-users can configure their own reports via self-service capabilities (1 point)\n2. Provided evidence of configurable reports Transnet can also build customized reports (1 point)\n3. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
["B","Solution Functionality\n","User Interface/Experience and Scalability of the Demand Management & Sourcing Modules","\n1. User Interface: Responsive - under 200ms user responsiveness time for 90% of interactions. Evidence in the form of  load times from different browser, screenshots or documents   (1 point)\n2. User Experience- user friction - Layout for a procurement solution, use of whitespace, use of appropriate UI design patterns. Evidence in the graphics user interface design and/or screenshot (1 point)\n3. User environment Journey mapping, customer experience analysis to ensure positive experience. Evidence in the form of flow diagrams or blueprint designs  (1 point)\n4. Provide previous/current detailed functional processes and process maps of the software workflows. Evidence in the form process map and/or workflow, graphic or screenshot   (1 point)\n5. Previous/current Internal Users Interface designs e.g. for (Buyers) . Evidence in the form of screenshot (1 point)\n6.  Previous/current External Users Interface designs e.g. for (External Users): Evidence in the form of screenshot(s)  (1 point)\n7. Ability to upload- readable excel files, that can auto populate key fields. Evidence in the form of documentation or screenshot  (1 point) \n8.Ability to read, edit, sign, generate, extract data from PDFs, Excel, Word, PowerPoint. Evidence in the form of documentation or screenshot (1 point)\n9. Availability of standardised modules. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set  (1 point)\n10. Flexibility of customisation of modules. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set  (1 point)\n11. Low/Code and No code customisation tools, that can allow for further internal customisation based on changing environment. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set (2 point)\n12. Scalability to Handle large Transaction volumes (50k internal users, 1M external users, loading, downloading multiple files, 5000 simultaneous/concurrent users. Evidence in the form of screenshot(s) or documented feature set (2 point)\n\n13. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":14,"d":"14.00"}]
[]
[null,null,"Demand Management","\n1. Automation of the approved demand budget into quantifiable demand quantities. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshot (2 points)\n2. Analysis of quantities into either categories, Products, etc. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshot (2 points)",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"1. Evidence of alerts to initiate a project (project plans linked to the Demand Plan/Procurement Plan, including onscreen scenarios e.g. time to initiate the project. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshot (2 points)\n",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"\n1. Automation of manual forms e.g., Request for Service (RFS), including the capability to replace the current manually captured processes into system generated processes and forms - these can be on Portal, as toolkit, or templates. Generate reference number. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshot (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"\n1. Allow for amendments. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshot (2 point)\n2. Allow for escalations. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshot (2 point)",{"v":4,"d":"4.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"\n1. Allow for workflow automation of approval or release strategy, linked to Delegation of Authority. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshot (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[null,null,"Strategic Sourcing","Allow for appointment of people to Cross-Functional Sourcing Team (CFST) and Cross-Functional Evaluation Team (CFET), including system alerts. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshot (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Generate and upload documentation (i.e. minutes, memos, etc.). As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots (1 point)",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Create / generate RFx documents and enable approval on the solution. As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Publish RFx documents on the relevant platform (e.g. e-Tender Portal, Construction Industry Development Board - CIDB etc.), including scheduling tender briefing sessions (approval of deviations through workflow). As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Enable loading of tender briefing session documents (i.e. minutes, questions etc.) As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Allow for workflow automation of approval or release strategy - linked to Delegation of Authority (DoA). As evidence, provide documentation (process flows or solution design) and/or screenshots (2 points)",{"v":2,"d":"2.00"}]
["C","Bidder's Experience -\n(Reference Letters)","Bidder provided relevant client references in the company letter from  clients who are/were currently using the software solution for automation of Demand Management and Strategic Sourcing. The following minimum verifiable information has been provided (company name, contact person, contact details and confirmation of the services rendered relevant to the  Procurement Process Automation/Digitalisation in the reference letter)\n\nTransnet reserves the right to contact the clients listed in order to verify the information provided.\n\nNote: For bidders that were subcontracting to other companies, a letter of reference from the main company (company with the client contract) or copy of contract between main company and subcontracting company, as proof that such subcontracting did exist. Transnet reserves the right to confirm / verify any such subcontracting agreements). Reference letter or contract must not be older than 5 years (i.e. July 2018). If the reference letter or contract is older than 5 years, is not dated, is not on a client’s letterhead, is not signed, or does not have client contact details, it shall not be considered as valid. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","One (1) relevant reference letters not older than July 2018 (i.e. 5 years) from clients on the services rendered automation of Demand Management and Strategic Sourcing. The reference letter with the following minimum information (company letterhead, company name, contact person, contact details and relevant description of services to Transnet scope of work)\n1. Relevant client Reference Letter 1 (10 point)\n\n2. Partial completion (i.e. missing information) on the letter may render the reference as non-responsive. Irrelevant description or insufficient information provided on description of services will render the letter as non-responsive. There are no partial points for allocation for reference letter. Bidder will score (0) points for each letter if the minimum requirements are not met,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.",{"v":10,"d":"10.00"}]
["D","Bidder's Experience)","Bidder must provide a summary report of the most recent project completed not older than July 2018 (i.e. 5 years) within software development and/or  integration and/or  customisation and/or implementation experience in Supply Chain Management /Procurement and/or Process Automation relevant and/or similar specific to automation Demand Management and Strategic Sourcing.  The summary report must not be more than 2000 words detailing the following:\n1. The client details (company name, contact person, contact number, email address)\n2. Date of assignment and current % completion and implementation of the project\n3. Problem statement\n4. Key project Deliverables \n5. Suppliers Project Approach\n6. Challenges, Risks, Issues, Lessons Learnt during the project\n7. Screenshots of the solution / use case with explanation of the functionality\n8. Improvements since completion and implementation of the project\n\nNote: For bidders that were subcontracting to other companies, a letter of reference from the main company (company with the client contract) or copy of contract between main company and subcontracting company, as proof that such subcontracting did exist, this must be included together with the summary report where applicable for ease of reference. Transnet reserves the right to confirm / verify any such subcontracting agreements). Reference letter or contract must not be older than 5 years (i.e. July 2018). If the reference letter or contract is older than 5 years, is not dated, is not on a client’s letterhead, is not signed, or does not have client contact details, it shall not be considered as valid.\n","One detailed Summary Report for the provision of Procurement Process Automation completed specific to automation of Demand Management and Strategic Sourcing. The Summary Report contains the following minimum information:\n\nSummary Report \n1. The client details (company name, contact person, contact number, email address) (Mandatory Information, bidder will score 0 points if this information is not provided)\n2. Date of assignment and current % completion and implementation of the project (2 point)\n3. Problem statement (2 point)\n4. Key project deliverables (2 point)\n5. Suppliers Project Approach (1 point)\n6. Challenges, Risks, Issues, Lessons Learnt during the project (1 point)\n7. Screenshots of the solution / use case with explanation of the functionality (2 point)\n8. Improvements since completion and implementation of the project (2 point)\n\n9. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n\n",{"v":12,"d":"12.00"}]
[]
[]
[]
["E","Project Methodology, Approach and Implementation Plan","Detailed agile project methodology and plan outlining the key phases, milestones, deliverables, and key activities with timelines for the implementation of the Procurement solution for Demand Management. As evidence, provide a clear illustration of the roll-out / deployment approach.","Project Methodology, approach and implementation plan with all activities including but not to in no particular order:\n1. Schedule with key activities and milestones (2 point)\n2. Resources (4 point)\n3. Roles & responsibilities (2 point)\n4. Tools, Techniques and Performance Measures (2 point)\n5. Other critical plans (i.e. including but not limited to Risk, Communication, HR, Quality & Cost Management) (2 point)\n6. Proposed Implementation plan will be delivered within targeted timelines (2 point)\n\n7. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":14,"d":"14.00"}]
["F","Project Team","Bidder provided an Organogram / Structure of the Key personnel/Staff/Team that will be assigned to the Transnet project for automation of the Demand Management and Strategic Sourcing c modules. The information provided include:\n1. Project/Programme Manager\n2. Core team to the project comprising of 3 - 7 personnel. Expertise required include but not limited to: Developer, Solution Architect, Test Specialist,  SAP Consultant & Information Security Engineer, Supply Chain Management\n3. The Project/Programme Manager and core team must each have more than 5 years of relevant experience\n4. Role and Responsibilities of each of the team members \n4. Number of hours of involvement of the team members to the project for the specific module ","\n1. Organogram / Structure of the  Project/ Programme Manager and a core team comprising of 3-7 resources that will be assigned to Transnet for the Demand Management and Strategic Sourcing Modules (3 point)\n2. 5 years relevant experience of each core team member (2 point)\n3. Expertise in the core team include at least Developer, Solution Architect & SAP Consultant (2 point)\n3. Qualifications of at least 3 core team members have   tertiary qualifications in IT/Computer Science or related qualifications (2 point)\n3. Roles and Responsibilities of each team member (3 point). \n\n4. Bidder will score full points points each requirement if all information is provided or score (0) points for each if the minimum requirements are not met for each requirement,  or if insufficient information is provided to meet minimum requirement, or if there is no information and/or most of the information provided is irrelevant to meet the minimum requirement.\n",{"v":12,"d":"12.00"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Total Points",{"$f":"SUM(E5:E34)","v":{"v":125,"d":"125.00"}}]
[{"$nulls":3},"Minimum Threshold",{"$f":"E35*0.75","v":93.75}]