{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Functional Evaluation"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Functional Evaluation","index":0,"n_rows":58,"n_cols":22,"rows_kept":58,"merged":[[6,2,6,14],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,13,3],[14,2,19,3],[20,2,24,3],[25,2,43,3],[27,4,29,4],[45,2,45,4],[46,2,46,4],[46,9,46,10],[46,13,46,14],[47,2,47,4],[47,9,47,10],[47,13,47,14],[48,2,48,4],[48,9,48,10],[48,13,48,14],[49,2,49,4],[49,9,49,10],[49,13,49,14],[50,2,50,4],[50,9,50,10],[50,11,50,12],[50,13,50,14],[55,2,58,7],[55,9,55,10],[55,13,55,14],[56,9,56,10],[56,13,56,14],[57,9,57,10],[57,13,57,14],[58,9,58,10],[58,13,58,14]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[{"$nulls":3},0,"Do Not Meet",{"$nulls":10},"MAX",null,"Not applicable",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0.49,"d":"49%"},"NOT MEET","0-49"]
[{"$nulls":3},1,"Partial Meet (large gap) ",{"$nulls":10},0,0,"Does not meet ",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},{"v":0.74,"d":"74%"},"PARTIAL MEET","50-74"]
[{"$nulls":3},2,"Partial Meet (small gap)",{"$nulls":10},0.5,1,"Partial meet (Large gap) ",{"v":0.75,"d":"75%"},{"v":0.79,"d":"79%"},"PARTIAL MEET","75-80"]
[{"$nulls":3},3,"Meet",{"$nulls":10},0.75,2,"Partial Meet (Small gap)",{"v":0.8,"d":"80%"},100,"MEET","80-100"]
[{"$nulls":15},1,3,"Meet "]
[{"$nulls":15},1,"X","Not applicable"]
[null,null,"Functional Evaluation Criteria for Enquiry No: KBG2068 - Reactor Coolant System (RCP) Pressuriser Heaters Replacement"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Requirements","Criteria ","Deliverables","Weighting",null," Rating","% Rating","% Score",null,"[Supplier] Response","Eskom Comments"]
[null,null,"1. Company Profile and Experience",null,1.1,"This organisational structure is well balanced and shows the function areas from CEO/MD down to the site management and the roles each member plays in delivering the specific required services.","Provide organisational structure of multi-disciplinary company highlighting key positions and how they will interface with Employer.",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.1","This submission includes the number of similar projects, customer surveys, referrals and traceable references. The references include a clear description of the project that was completed by the Tenderer, including location and the client’s contact details.","Submit a portfolio of previous pressurizer heater replacements projects in the Nuclear industry including ASME NQA-1 or RCC-M certification. ",{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.2","Review of previous quality concerns, delays etc and response to these issues ","Submit quality and defect reports for similar projects at other nuclear utilities.",{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},1.3,"This submission needs to show that the resources have relevant experience and that the Succession and Retention Strategy does not expose Eskom to risk. ","Submit a detailed list of experiences and skills of resources in the form of CVs of the Tenderer’s core team for design, installation and execution and a Succession and Retention Strategy on sustaining these permanent skilled resources for the duration of the contract.",{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},1.4,"The submission proves that the resources are registered with the required institutions.","Submit a list of the resources that are registered with ECSA that will provide a service to the project. If the Tenderer is not South African or makes use of international resources, then the Tenderer submits a list of resources that are registered with similar/relevant international organisations that will provide a service to the project.",{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",null,null,{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"2. Engineering and Execution Strategy",null,2.1,"The Execution Strategy is tailor made for the project showing how the Tenderer has considered each portion of the scope and how they plan to deliver. The Tenderer includes a list of exclusions and deviations. This list explains the proposed exclusion/deviation, the rationale for the exclusion/deviation, any technical data supporting the exclusion/deviation and historical experience supporting the exclusion/deviation. The Execution strategy lists and offers pressuriser heaters that  is designed and manufactured for use in reactor coolant system pressuriser vessels in nuclear power plants as required by the technical requirement specification document 240-162152145.","Engineering Execution Strategy - Scope",{"v":0.2,"d":"20%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},2.2,"The Tenderer shows in his Execution Strategy that all the requirements listed in the Technical requirement Specification document 240-162152145 can be achieved with the design and installation of the pressuriser heaters as well as the removal of the currently installed pressuriser heaters at Koeberg Nuclear Power Station.","Engineering Execution Strategy - Requirements",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},2.3,"The Tenderer provides a risk register which addresses the key risks and constraints of the project. The register includes a clear description of the risk, the root cause, a risk ranking and a mitigation plan, including a rating on the effectiveness of the mitigation plan. The risk should include plans to remedy  a stuck pressuriser heater situation should it occur during the removal of the currently installed pressuriser heaters at Koeberg Nuclear Power Station.","Engineering Execution Strategy - Risk",{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},2.4,"The Tenderer’s submission includes a section on training and skills transfer which shows how the Tenderer plans to carry out training and skills transfer as applicable for the project.","Engineering Execution Strategy - Training",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},2.5,"The Execution Strategy lists the documents that the Tenderer plans to submit throughout the project.","Engineering Execution Strategy - Documents",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",null,null,{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"3. Project Programme",null,3.1,"The Programme includes the following:\n• A comprehensive narrative which describes the basis of the programme; and\n• A list of assumptions that the programme was based on.","Level 3 Project Programme",{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},3.2,"The programme shows a list of comprehensive activities with logical links/ sequence/ relationships that connect the various activities together and shows all hold points. A comprehensive description of each activity, including the name and designation of the responsible person.","Level 3 Project Programme",{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},3.3,"The CPM (Critical Path Method) technique is used for programme and planning. The critical path is clearly illustrated.","Level 3 Project Programme",{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},3.4,"The services are completed within accepted durations that are in consistence with key dates provided in the Contract Data. Milestone dates in line with Key Date/Contract Data is showed on the schedule.","Level 3 Project Programme",{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",null,null,{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"4. Quality Assurance Programme",null,"IMS Certification","A mature implemented Management System with certification for ISO 9001:2015 and audit reports indicating compliance with ASME NQA-1 and IAEA G-S-R Part 2 or equivalent. (238-101 Rev2)","Copies of Management System Certification and supporting audit reports.",{"v":0.045,"d":"4.5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"SCEP","Confirm that a Nuclear Safety Culture Policy and Safety Culture Enhancement Programme (SCEP) exists supported by implemented procedures that aligns to the principles of INPO or IAEA INSAG 4 and 15. (238-219 Rev1)","IMS Manual include a Nuclear Safety Culture Policy and a Nuclear Safety Culture Enhancement Programme (SCEP)",{"v":0.045,"d":"4.5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"PLANNING","Proof that the Contract Quality Management Plan (CQMP) indicates compliance with customer and nuclear regulator requirements. ","Examples for similar large projects.",{"v":0.045,"d":"4.5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":5},"Proof that the Quality Control Plan (QCP) indicates compliance with customer and nuclear regulator requirements. ","Examples for similar large projects.",{"v":0.045,"d":"4.5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":5},"Proof that the Safety Culture Plan (SCP) indicates compliance with customer and nuclear regulator requirements. ","Example  for similar large projects.",{"v":0.03,"d":"3.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Change Control","Evidence of a change control process incorporating changes affecting the organization, including structure, staffing levels and resources that may adversely affect safety and quality","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.045,"d":"4.5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Interface Control","Demonstrate that measures exist to control internal and external interfaces to the organisation and that adequate oversight measures are implemented to retain intelligent customer capability.","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.045,"d":"4.5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Management Review","Demonstrate that the executive management reProcess ensures that the IMS is suitable and effective with respect to nuclear safety and quality policy (including safety culture), it addresses regulations, codes and standards and shows evidence that the organisation is continually improving.","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.06,"d":"6.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Management Responsibilities","Management responsibility with respect to nuclear safety and quality (including safety culture): \n• organisation structure, (show responsibilities, reporting lines and the process for delegation of authority), \n• Management commitment and participation. (Demonstrate where this is defined, documented and how it is communicated to staff)\n• Policy, strategy plans, objectives, indicators and targets (Demonstrate where this is defined, documented and how the level of achievement informs the management review process.)\n","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.06,"d":"6.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Risk management","Provide the IMS corrective and preventive action processes. Demonstrate that adequate measures are in place to ensure that corrective and preventive actions are being resolved satisfactorily and are closed out within agreed timeline.","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.06,"d":"6.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Human Resources","Demonstrate that adequate measures with respect to nuclear safety and quality (including safety culture) are in place to ensure that suitable personnel are selected, indoctrinated, specific training is scheduled and implemented and formal assessment of competence including authorisation is conducted and documented.","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.06,"d":"6.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Safety Culture  and Human Performance","Evidence of Safety Culture Enhancement Programme (SCEP) and supporting implementing procedures and plan are in place to address the following: (SC Policy Statement and Top Management Commitment, SC Talks/Themes, Human Performance Tool Usage, Conservative Decision Making, Inclusion of SC Event Reporting in Problem Management, Evidence of Safety Culture requirements communicated to Sub Suppliers) and evidence of compliance of SCEP with INPO principles or IAEA INSAG 4 and 15.","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.06,"d":"6.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Supplier Qualification","Evidence of implementation of L1 or L2 supplier selection and qualification process that include client particiption. View results of supplier qualification e.g. capability assessment reports, supplier audit reports, Approved Suppliers List (ASL) and Approved Suppliers databases including details of supplier restrictions/limitations.","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.08,"d":"8.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Supplier Monitoring","What is the extent of the nuclear quality oversight programme on RD-0034 Level 1/2 sub-suppliers? ","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.06,"d":"6.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"IMS KPI","Show how nuclear safety and quality objectives and performance indicators are tracked, trended, evaluated and acted upon and how is this benchmarked against internationally accepted principles and standards.","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.06,"d":"6.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Internal audits and self-assessments","Proof of implementation of internal audits and self-assessments to demonstrate measurement of programmes and processes with respect to nuclear  safety (including safety culture) and quality management.","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.08,"d":"8.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Non-conformances","Show non-conformance, deviation and concession process, including disposition. Proof of customer notification for non-conforming products as identified and reported. ","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.06,"d":"6.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Nuclear Safety concerns","Demonstrate that an effective reporting culture in the company exists where anybody in the company is allowed to freely report issues, nuclear safety concerns and conditions adverse to quality.","Process document and records demonstrating implementation.",{"v":0.06,"d":"6.0%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[]
[null,null,"Final Analysis"]
[null,null,"1. Company Profile and Experience",{"$nulls":4},{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"2. Engineering and Execution Strategy",{"$nulls":4},{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"3. Project Programme",{"$nulls":4},{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"4. Quality Assurance Programme",{"$nulls":4},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"TOTAL",{"$nulls":4},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"NOT RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"RE-EVALUATE",{"$nulls":5},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"},null,null,{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[]
[null,null,"The scoring of the Quality Evaluation Criteria is conducted as follows:\nA supplier is given a score in each of the sub-categories. These sub-categories are requirements detailed in the specification or contract. Scores are allocated as follows:\n0 - 0% -    Does not meet \n1 - 50% -  Partial meet (Large gap) \n2 - 75% - Partial Meet (Small gap)\n3- 100% - Meet                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          The overall score for functionality criteria is  analysed as follows:\n0%     - 79%   - Does not meet\n80%   - 100% - Meet\n                                                                                   ",{"$nulls":6},"NOT MEET"]
[]
[{"$nulls":19},"`"]