{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["Risk template","Consequence rating","Likelihood rating","Risk control effectiveness","Risk matrix"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":4},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Risk template","index":0,"n_rows":51,"n_cols":44,"rows_kept":51,"merged":[[2,0,2,23],[3,1,3,8],[3,10,3,13],[3,14,3,19],[4,0,4,23],[5,0,8,0],[5,1,8,8],[5,9,8,9],[5,10,8,11],[5,12,8,13],[5,14,5,17],[5,18,8,21],[6,14,6,17],[7,14,7,17],[8,14,8,17],[9,0,9,23],[10,15,11,15],[11,29,14,29],[12,0,20,0],[24,0,31,0],[25,3,26,3],[34,0,35,0],[36,0,39,0],[42,0,46,0]]}
[]
[]
["Occupational Health and Safety Baseline risk assessment template"]
["Business/Operating unit:","Apollo & Centralised Services(Aviation)",{"$nulls":7},"Department:","Aviation",{"$nulls":9},"Next Review Date \n(every 2 years):  ",null,"Template identifier: ","240-70044602"]
[]
[" Date:    ","2022-09-15",{"$nulls":7},"Prepared by:   ","Muzikayise Skenjana\nGerrit Crafford\nKutloano Sebetlela\nSephan Bosman\nOmphile Mocwaledi\nKefuoue Sethoua\nNkhensani Baloyi",null,"Authorised by:   ",null,"Name:  ",{"$nulls":7},"Document identifier","240-158458241",{"$nulls":14},"R","Safety",1,"A","Fully effective","I"]
[{"$nulls":14},"Designation:",{"$nulls":7},"Revision number:",4,{"$nulls":14},"N","Health",2,"B","Mostly effective","II"]
[{"$nulls":14},"Signed:",{"$nulls":7},"Revision date: ","2024-05-31",{"$nulls":16},3,"C","Mostly ineffective","III"]
[{"$nulls":14},"Date:",{"$nulls":25},4,"D","None","IV"]
["Refer to Occupational Health and Safety Risk assessment procedure 32-520",{"$nulls":39},5,"E"]
["List activity"," Activity type \n(Routine/Non-routine)","Hazard nr","Hazard Identification","Risk Nr","Associated risk","Risk type","Cause(s) of the risk","Exposed group/employees","Risk Owner","Exposure patterns","What are the possible consequences?","Existing Controls"," ",null,"Risk Priority Rating",null,"Additional Controls or Tasks Aimed at improving Existing Controls","Monitoring  Mechanisms","Control Owner","Legal and Other Requirements","Target Date","Current Status","Integrated Risk Management (IRM) reference number",{"$nulls":16},6]
["List specific activities to be performed taking into consideration the equipment to be used, the personnel involved in the task.","              Indicate R or N \n1. Routine activities and situations create hazards through day-to-day operations and normal\nwork activities;\n2. Non-routine activities and situations are occasional or unplanned;","#","Anything  with potential to cause  of harm. \nNote: A hazard can pose more than one risk.","#","A chance that injury , ill health or damage could occur as a result of uncontrolled hazard.","Safety or health","What causes the risk to come into effect?","Who is exposed to the hazard i.e.    visitors, members of the public, etc.","Who is accountable for making sure the controls and monitors are:\n-  in place,\n-  implemented,\n-  regularly reviewed for effectiveness.","The frequency and duration  the person/group is exposed to the hazard e.g. Daily for 3 hrs.","Consider the worse case scenario without controls?","Include:\n- Preventative Controls\n(controls implemented to eliminate hazards or reduce the likelihood of the risk occurring), and\n- Reactive Controls \n(controls implemented to reduce the immediate impact of the risk occurring)    \n\nElimination\nSubstitution \nEngineering controls \nAdministrative controls \nPersonal protective equipment (PPE)","Consequence","Likelihood",null,"RCE\nRisk Control Effectiveness","Include:\n- Preventative Controls\n(controls implemented to eliminate hazards or reduce the likelihood of the risk occurring), and\n- Reactive Controls \n(controls implemented to reduce the immediate impact of the risk occurring)  \n\nElimination\nSubstitution \nEngineering controls \nAdministrative controls \nPersonal protective equipment (PPE)","How we know if we are succeeding. Include comments on effectiveness.\nThis may include i.e. measurements, inspections, supervision where necessary.","Person allocated the responsibility for implementing the agreed controls ","Where relevant, list the relevant legislative and or Eskom requirements that prescribe the control.","Once a date has been agreed to, this  can not be changed","Pending,\nIn Progress,\nComplete","Where applicable, add IRM system reference number for tracking of treatment actions. ",{"$nulls":5},"Consequences",6,"III","II","I","I","I"]
[null,"R",1,"Excessive use of Computers",1,"Sight deterioration","Health","Eye exposure to computer screens without sufficient rest, exposed to lighting of unknown intensity","All employees using computers","BU Manager","Daily, 8 hours","1.Unsuitable luminance and extreme contrasts may cause a visual condition        where there is discomfort as well as a reduced ability to see identifiable objects.\n2 Flickering lights can induce visual discomfort, headaches and stroboscopic effects (optical illusions) particularly in sensitive individuals. \n4.Eye fatigue","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4. Administrative: Take frequent breaks from the computer\nConduct office ergonomics awareness sessions\nConduct periodic medical surveillance\nReporting of malfunctioning of computer/laptops\nReport and replace all defective fluorescent tubes in the office, or change light fittings to give wider and even light distribution.   \nIllumination surveys      \n5. PPE- N/A",4,"C","II","Mostly effective","No additional control measures","1.OHS Inspections  \n2. Lighting survey","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3;\n Facilities Regulations, 2004, Sec: 8;  \nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3 & 4; Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997, Sec: 7; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nErgonomics regulations 2019:3,4,6 \nEskom SHEQ Policy;                                                                32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \n240 - 75567900 Manual for Internal Quality Assurance Management of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-285 Medical surveillance; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;\n\n","N/A","Complete","N/A",{"$nulls":6},4,"IV","III","II","I","I"]
[null,"R",2,"Glare",2,"Damage of optical nerves","Health","When glare reflecting from the windows reach the surface of computer screen","Employees whose computers are facing the windows","BU Manager","Daily, 8 hours","1. The presence of glare may lead to discomfort and impairment of vision. \n2. Flickering lights can induce visual discomfort, headaches and stroboscopic effects (optical illusions) particularly in sensitive individuals. \n3.Eye fatigue","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4. Administrative: Encourage employees to close the blinds\nTrain employees on Ergonomics (dangers associated with glare reflection on their computer screens)\nMedical surveillance programme\nTaking regular breaks from the screen\nRearrange the office sitting to prevent glare exposure. \nEnsure that the blinds when the exposure is high are closed\n5. PPE- N/A",4,"C","II","Mostly effective","No additional control measures","BSO'S\nInspections\n","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3; \nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3 & 4; SANS 10400 (National Building Regulations and Standards Act) 17 & Q1; SANS 10114-1 (artificial Lighting); SANS 10400- Part O (National building regulations and Standards Act); Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727 Eskom SHEQ Policy 32-722;\n 32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; 240 - 75567900 Manual for Internal Quality Assurance Management of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-285 Medical surveillance; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure;   ","N/A","Complete","N/A",{"$nulls":6},3,"IV","III","II","II","I"]
[null,"R",3,"Workstation layout and PCs",3,"Ergonomics\nMusculoskeletal disorders","Health","Workstation designs incompatible with PC , office layout causing obstructions in the event of emergency","All employees","BU Manager","Daily, 8 hours","Falling and body injuries, Back, neck, eye and shoulder strain \n","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4. Administrative:  Workstations should be designed to prevent  awkward postures, that can lead to musculoskeletal disorders \nProvide height adjustable chairs with good back support in the offices\nCreate workstation space by providing storage cabinets for documents and files\nErgonomics surveys\nErgonomics awareness\nPeriodic medical evaluations\n5. PPE- N/A\n",4,"C","II","Mostly effective","1.Replace chairs & office furniture that needs replacement\n","Ergonomics Survey, \nBSO's,\nOHS inspections","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993  (Act No. 85 of 1993)  8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9;  General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2 & 3\n Facilities Regulations, 2004, Sec: 8 \nErgonomics Regulation, 2020 Sec: 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10 \nBasic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997, Sec: 7 Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy;\n 32-285 Medical surveillance;\n 240 - 75567900 Manual for Internal Quality Assurance Management of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority        \n 32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development; \n32-285 Medical surveillance                                                \n32-95 Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure;                                                 \n 32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure","2023-12-01","Pending,\n","N/A",{"$nulls":6},2,"IV","IV","III","II","II"]
[null,"R",4,"Various Cleaning Agents (Detergents)",4,"Poor indoor air quality","Health","When the cleaning substances are used on workstations and other office surfaces","Employees,contractos and visitors in office environment","BU Manager","Daily, ","Eye irritation\nUpper respiratory tract symptoms(throat,nose,lungs irritation)","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-less harmful cleaning products are used currently\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: The ready availability of Materials Safety Data sheets \nBasic awareness on HCS\nEncourage employees that are reacting to the cleaning substances to vacate workstations during office cleaning\n5. PPE- Use of masks where applicable",2,"A","IV","Fully effective","No additional control measures","1.BSO's\n","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19;\n Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43;\nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3;\nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 5; SANS 10400 (National Building Regulations and Standards Act) Sec: 17(1) O1;\nHazardous chemical substances:3, 4,5,6,7\n 32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy;\n 240 - 75567900 Manual for Internal Quality Assurance Management of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority;\n 32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure;\n 32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development; \n32-285 Medical surveillance;\n 32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; ","N/A","Complete","N/A",{"$nulls":7},"A","B","C","D","E"]
[null,"R",5,"Inadequate mechanical ventilation",5,"respiratory infections from contaminated air","Health","Dirty Filters in Air conditioners","Employees\nVisitors","BU Manager","Daily","Respiratory problems for staff & visitors","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: Reporting of air conditioners  that are not working\nServicing of air conditioners\n5. PPE- N/A",2,"B","IV","Fully effective","No additional control measures","1. Monthly checklists \n","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43;\nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3; \nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 5; SANS 10400 (National Building Regulations and Standards Act) Sec: 17(1) O1; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy;\n 240 - 75567900 Manual for Internal Quality Assurance Management of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure;\n 32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development; \n32-285 Medical surveillance;\n 32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,null,6,"Poor illumination",6,"Eye sight  deterioration","Health","1) Illumination not meeting legal requirement\n2) Unsuitable luminance and extreme contrasts may cause a visual condition where there is discomfort\n3) Flickering lights can induce visual discomfort, headaches and stroboscopic effects (optical illusions) particularly in sensitive individuals.  ","All Office occupants","BU Manager","Daily, 8 hours","Eye sight deterioration","1) Elimination: Not possible. need artificial natural light. \n2) Substitution: Can't replace artificial lights.\n3) Engineering controls: Not possible to have glass roofs to allow natural light into the building.\n4) Administrative controls: Applicable\nConduct Illumination surveys at required intervals to determine the quality and suitability of the light;\nConduct periodic medical surveillance;\nConduct SHE inspections at required intervals;\nReport all defective light sources to ERE\n5) PPE: None",{"$nulls":4},"No additional control measures","Illumination surveys\nSHE Representative inspections","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43;\nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3; \nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 5; SANS 10400 (National Building Regulations and Standards Act) Sec: 17(1) O1; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy;\nManagement of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure;\n 32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development; \n32-285 Medical surveillance;\n 32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",7,"Cleaning Fluids\nHazardous cleaning fluids",7,"Consumption, eye or skin contact","Health","Fluids ingested or splashed into eyes or contacting with skin","Cleaners","BU Manager","Daily","Skin irritation, loss of sight, poisoning or death of staff member","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative:MSDS for cleaning fluids in place\nEmergency contact numbers accessible\nTraining on HCS\nMedical surveillance\n5. PPE- N/A\n",3,"A","IV","Fully effective","None","1. Monthly checklists \n2. Internal audits","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003, Sec:  6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3;\n Regulation for Hazardous Chemical Substance (1995) Sec: 3, 4, 5, 7, 10 & 11; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; \n32-285 Medical surveillance; \n32-123  Emergency planning; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure;\n 32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",8,"Ascending and descending the stairs",8,"Slip, Trip & Fall","Safety","1. Not holding onto the hand rail when going up/down stairs\n2. Wearing shoes with leather soles/slippery soles\n3. Carrying items that obscure your view of the stairs\n4. Distractions such as conversations / usage of a cell phone\n5. Rushing up/down the stairs","Employees\nVisitors\nContractors","BU Manager","Daily","Body injuries","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: Warning signs- hold onto handrails when using the stairs\nSafety awareness (safety themes on slips, trips and falls)\nSafety awareness (lessons learnt from falls down stairs & near miss incidents)\nConduct BSO's\nReport defects (e.g.  loose tiles or handrails) to ERE\n5. PPE- N/A",5,"E","I","Mostly effective","No additional control measures","1.Near Miss & Incident Reports\n2. BSO's reports","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993  (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003  6, 7, 8 & 9; \nGeneral Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2, 2b & 3; \nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3, 4 & 6; \nFacilities Regulations, 2004, Sec: 9 ; \nSANS 10400 (National Building Regulations and Standards Act) Sec: 17(1) D1 & Part M; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; \n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure                                                                          32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations        ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",9,"Slippery Surfaces",9,"Slips, Trips & Falls","Safety","1. Wet surfaces during cleaning/after a spillage of liquid\n2. Wearing shoes with limited grip on the soles.\n3. Use of cleaning products that make tiles more slippery\n4. Employees running in the work areas","Employees\nVisitors","BU Manager","Daily","Body injuries\nMedical Incidents\nLost time injuries\nFatality","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative\nUse of warning signage when floors are being cleaned.\nImmediate cleaning of any spillages on floors\nAdditional Warning signage has been placed in the kitchen on a permanent basis\nReporting to ERE of leaking areas..\nSafety shoes are worn by employees who require such PPE in there areas.\nSafety awareness on slip,trips,and falls\n5. PPE- N/A",5,"E","I","Mostly effective","No additional control measures","Incident Reports\nBSO's","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993  (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003  6, 7, 8 & 9;\nGeneral Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,2(b),  & 3;\nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3, 4 & 6; \nFacilities Regulations, 2004, Sec: 9 ;\nSANS 10400 (National Building Regulations and Standards Act) Sec: 17(1) D1 & Part M; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy;\n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",11,"Peeling floor carpets \nPeeling/broken tiles\n",11,"Trips and Falls","Safety","When carpets peel off from the floor","Employees working in offices and visitors","BU Manager","Daily, 8 hours","Injuries from trips and falls","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: Health and Safety inspections\nProvide training on basic office safety and on office ergonomics\nReporting any defects to ERE\n5. PPE- N/A  ",3,"C","II","Fully effective","Maintain the existing controls ","Health and Safety inspections","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993  (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19 ; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003  6, 7, 8 & 9 ;\nGeneral Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3 ; \nElectrical Installation Regulations, Sec 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 9; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43;\n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; \n32-123  Emergency planning; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development; ","N/A","Complete"]
[null,null,12,"Lethal poison from snakes, ticks, mosquitos, bees, spiders and scorpion bites. \n",12,"Snake and insect bites","Safety","1. Exposure to hazards of nature\n","Supervisors,Officers,assistant officers and trainees","BU Manager","Daily","Medical incident\nLost Time Injury","1) Elimination: Not possible\n2) Substitution: No need to replace\n3) Engineering controls: Not possible \n4) Administrative controls: Applicable \nRisk assessment and response is discussed before any work commences\nEmergency contact numbers for the snake catchers\nBe on a lookout for dangerous reptiles, and ensure that the first aid kit is readily available.\nTrained and appointed first aider \nMedical surveillance\nTraining and awareness on hazards of nature\n5: PPE: PPE as per task specific risk assessment\n\n",{"$nulls":4},"No additional control measures","Incident Reports\n","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993  (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003  6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3;\nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3, 4 & 6; \nFacilities Regulations, 2004, Sec: 9 ; \nSANS 10400 (National Building Regulations and Standards Act) Sec: 17(1) D1 & Part M; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; \n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure ","N/A","Complete"]
[]
["Driving"]
[null,"R",14,"Unroadworthy vehicles",14,"Motor vehicle accident","Safety","Inadequate communication for employees using fleet vehicles\nLack or inadequate vehicle pre-trip inspection\nLack  or inadequate vehicle servicing and maintenance \nVehicles not replaced as per the request","Employees & members of the public","BU Manager","Daily","Vehicle breakdown\nInjuries resulting the MVA's","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative –trip inspections to ensure that the vehicle is in good condition before driving.\nRegular maintenance as per the manufacture's specification or when required.\nDriver and safety awareness campaigns\n5. PPE- N/A   \n                              ",5,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional control measures","Inspection reports\nMaintenance reports      \n           ","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19;\nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003, Sec:  6, 7, 8 & 9; \nGeneral Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; \nNational Road Management Traffic Act 93 of 1996 Sec: 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, & 65; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure;\n 240-62946386 Eskom Vehicle Safety and Driver Management procedure; \n32-345 Eskom Vehicle Safety Specifications procedure; \n32-37 Substance Abuse Procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",null,null,14.1,"Vehicle breakdown and brake failure ","Safety","Lack or inadequate vehicle maintenance","Employees & members of the public","BU Manager","Daily","Fatalities                                                           \nLost Time Injury                                                   \nMedical Incident         \nProperty damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: Vehicles to be maintained in a roadworthy condition as per the manufacture's instruction.\nPretrip inspections\nQuarterly vehicle inspections\n5. PPE- N/A   ",4,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional control measures","Maintenance reports Inspection","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003, Sec:  6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43;\n National Road Management Traffic Act 93 of 1996 Sec: 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, & 65; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure; \n240-62946386 Eskom Vehicle Safety and Driver Management procedure; \n32-345 Eskom Vehicle Safety Specifications procedure; \n32-37 Substance Abuse Procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",15,"Inclement weather",15,"Motor vehicle accident","Safety","Road conditions/selection                        \nLack of driver experience to drive in inclement weather                 ","Employees","BU Manager","Depending on season or weather condition","Fatalities                                                           \nLost Time Injury                                                   \nMedical Incident         \nProperty damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: Drivers to do risk assessment at they drive and adjust speed as per as per prevailing weather condition\nDrivers to be cautious when driving in an adverse weather condition and plan the routes properly\nDrivers to maintain a safe following distance\nVehicle and driver safety awareness\nAdvanced/Defensive driver training\n5. PPE- N/A  \n\n",4,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional control measures","BSO's\nDriver Observation","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; General Administrative Regulations, 2003, Sec:  6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; National Road Management Traffic Act 93 of 1996 Sec: 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, & 65; 32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; 32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; 32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure; 240-62946386 Eskom Vehicle Safety and Driver Management procedure; 32-345 Eskom Vehicle Safety Specifications procedure; 32-37 Substance Abuse Procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",16,"Animals on the road",16,"Motor vehicle accident","Safety","Inadequate or continuous risk assessment   \nDriving very early in the morning or at night","Employees & members of the public","BU Manager","Daily","Fatalities                                                           \nLost Time Injury                                                   \nMedical Incident         \nProperty damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: Be on a look out of stray / wild animals and adjust speed where necessary as per the road warning signs. \nAdvanced & defensive driver training\nRoute risk assessment\nDriver safety awareness campaigns\nDrive cams\nOBC reports\n5. PPE- N/A ",4,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional control measures","BSO's\nDriver Observation","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; General Administrative Regulations, 2003, Sec:  6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; National Road Management Traffic Act 93 of 1996 Sec: 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, & 65; 32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; 32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; 32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure; 240-62946386 Eskom Vehicle Safety and Driver Management procedure; 32-345 Eskom Vehicle Safety Specifications procedure; 32-37 Substance Abuse Procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",17,"Poor road condition\n",17,"Motor vehicle accident","Safety"," 1. Uneven, damaged and gravel road conditions and bad terrain                           \n2. Poor vehicle maintenance which might lead to whole body vibrating when driving on gravel road\n3.Road works","Employees & members of the public","BU Manager","Daily","Fatalities                                                           \nLost Time Injury                                                   \nMedical Incident         \nProperty damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: Caution should be taken when driving is in an uneven, damaged and gravel road conditions or an alternative route should be taken.\nAdhere to prescribed speed limit and road warning signs\nAdequate and regular maintenance of the vehicles to reduce exposure to whole body vibration to a larger extent..\nTravel route risk assessment\nAdvanced/Defensive driver training\nReducing speed as per road conditions\n5. PPE- N/A ",4,"C","II","Mostly effective","No additional control measures","BSO's\nDriver Observation","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; General Administrative Regulations, 2003, Sec:  6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; National Road Management Traffic Act 93 of 1996 Sec: 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, & 65; 32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; 32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; 32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure; 240-62946386 Eskom Vehicle Safety and Driver Management procedure; 32-345 Eskom Vehicle Safety Specifications procedure; 32-37 Substance Abuse Procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",18,"Stones / Loose objects dispersing from the road",18,"Windscreen Chips","Safety","1. Stones and other debris on the road dispersed or falling off other vehicles  and striking  the windscreen","Employees","BU Manager","Daily","Property Damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: All drivers should be reminded to  maintain a safe following distance whilst driving on a public road.\nAll drivers should be vigilant and cautious when driving.\nEmployees to declare when using medication that will affect the ability of the employee to drive \nAll drivers to attend advanced driving and  defensive driving mechanisms and be able to apply the skills on the road.                          \n5. PPE- N/A \n",4,"C","II","Mostly effective","No additional control measures","1.Near Miss and Incident reports","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003, Sec:  6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43;\n National Road Management Traffic Act 93 of 1996 Sec: 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, & 65; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure;\n 32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure; \n240-62946386 Eskom Vehicle Safety and Driver Management procedure; \n32-345 Eskom Vehicle Safety Specifications procedure; \n32-37 Substance Abuse Procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",19,"Bumping against poles and parked vehicles when reverse parking",19,"Property Damage\nMotor vehicle accident","Safety","1.Lack of  Situational Awareness \n2. Driver Fatigue\n3. Distractions such as cell phone usage while reversing\n","Employees\nVisitors\nContractors\n","BU Manager","Daily","Property Damage / resultant negative financial impact","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: Employees to declare when using medication that will affect the ability of the employee to drive\nAll drivers to be always vigilant when reversing\nDriver safety awareness \nLessons learnt from all minor vehicle incidents are shared in order to create additional awareness.  \nEmployees to observe when reversing and not reliant on the reverse sensors/camera's fitted on vehicles which might vary with vehicle type                 \n5. PPE- N/A \n",4,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional control measures","Vehicle Incident Reports\nBSO's","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003, Sec:  6, 7, 8 & 9; \nGeneral Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43;\nNational Road Management Traffic Act 93 of 1996 Sec: 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, & 65; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy;\n 32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure;\n32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure; \n240-62946386 Eskom Vehicle Safety and Driver Management procedure; \n32-345 Eskom Vehicle Safety Specifications procedure; 32-37 \nSubstance Abuse Procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Exposure to sunrays",null,"Motor vehicle accident","Safety","Driving during sunrise and sunset","Employees & members of the public",null,"Daily","Fatalities                                                           \nLost Time Injury                                                   \nMedical Incident         \nProperty damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls: \n4. Administrative: \nLimiting travel during these times where possible\nDriver safety awareness campaigns\n        \n5. PPE- N/A ",4,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional control measures","Inspection reports\n    \n           ","Departmental Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993)  Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003, Sec:  6, 7, 8 & 9; \nGeneral Safety Regulations, 1986 Sec: 2,  & 3; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43;\nNational Road Management Traffic Act 93 of 1996 Sec: 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, & 65; \n32-727 Eskom SHEQ policy;\n 32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure;\n32-520 Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment Procedure; \n240-62946386 Eskom Vehicle Safety and Driver Management procedure; \n32-345 Eskom Vehicle Safety Specifications procedure; 32-37 \nSubstance Abuse Procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[]
["Aircraft with running engines","R",21,"Proximity of people to aircraft",21,"Aircraft noise","Health","Aircraft engine running\nProximity of people to aircraft without hearing protection","Employees\nPassengers\nContractors","BU Manager","Daily for less than 10 minutes","Noise induced hearing loss","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4. Administrative: Briefed before boarding an aircraft\nNoise surveys conducted\nWarning signs displayed\nAwareness training given to staff\nInduction training given to visitors / contractors\nPPE: Hearing protection issued",4,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional controls","1. Behavioural Safety Observations \n2. Surveillance Medicals","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nNoise induced hearing loss regulation\n 32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \nManagement of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;Civil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nAir Services Licensing Act 115 of 1990\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\nConvention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft Act 59 of 1993\nInternational Air Services Act 60 of 1993   ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",22,"Proximity of people to aircraft",22,"Walking into moving parts of the aircraft","Safety","Lack of knowledge / guidance","Employees\nPassengers\nContractors","BU Manager","Daily for less than 10 minutes","Injury/Fatality or property damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4. Administrative\n1. Employees that are authorised to be in the proximity of aircraft movements have done Airside Induction or are qualified pilots or aircraft engineers with adequate knowledge of the risks.\n2. Passengers are escorted to and from the aircraft and guided to avoid injury.\n3. Contractors are only permitted in the proximity of aircraft movements while accompanied by an Eskom employee.",5,"B","II","Fully effective","No additional controls","1. Behavioural Safety Observations","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9;   \n Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \nManagement of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\nCivil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nAir Services Licensing Act 115 of 1990\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\nConvention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft Act 59 of 1993\nInternational Air Services Act 60 of 1993   ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
["Flights by all aircraft","R",23,"Flying of aircraft and truck driving",23,"Pilots and truck drivers experiencing vibrations when flying or driving ","Health","Engines of aircraft & trucks on rough terrain","Pilots\nFuel Support Drivers\nPassengers/Inspectors","BU Manager","Daily","Fatigue\nTemporary discomfort\n\n","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-All trucks are fitted with air suspension seats to minimise excessive vibrations\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4Administrative: Pilots use their discretion to take breaks when needed.\nPeriodic medical surveillance\nFatigue Management awareness\n5.PPE: N/A",2,"C","III","Fully effective","No additional controls","Incident Reports","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3;\nFacilities Regulations, 2004, Sec: 8;  \nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3 & 4; Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997, Sec: 7; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nNoise induced hearing loss regulation\n 32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \nManagement of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-285 Medical surveillance; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;Civil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nAir Services Licensing Act 115 of 1990\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\nConvention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft Act 59 of 1993\nInternational Air Services Act 60 of 1993   ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",24,"Poor weather conditions \n(Bad weather)",24,"Incident / Accident \n(Air crash)","Safety","Microbursts / Icing / Lightning / Poor visibility / Damage to the aircraft e.g. by hail","Employees\nPassengers\nMembers of the public","BU Manager","Ad hoc for short periods","Injury/fatality of pilots, passengers & third parties on the ground or aircraft loss/damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative: Pilots are trained to check the weather for their planned route prior to every flight\nRW flights  only conducted in  visual Flight Rules\nChartered FW aircraft  are equipped with weather radar to assist pilots to fly around the worst sections of a storm \nPeriodic training of pilots\nRisk Assessment Tool is completed by pilots prior to every flight",5,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional controls","1. Internal Audits\n2. Incident Reports","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9;  Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;Civil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nAir Services Licensing Act 115 of 1990\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\nConvention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft Act 59 of 1993\nInternational Air Services Act 60 of 1993   ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",25,"Overweight Baggage / Passengers",25,"Overweight baggage / passengers which could affect the weight and balance of the aircraft","Safety","Baggage / Passengers not being weighed","Pilots\nPassengers\nMembers of the public","BU Manager","Ad hoc for short periods","Injury/fatality of pilots, passengers & third parties on the ground or aircraft loss/damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative: Ops sends a reminder to all passengers prior to flights regarding the baggage weight limitations. \nOps requests passenger weights prior to  flights. \n3 PIC remains responsible to weigh a bag if they suspect the weight to be in excess of the allowable amount or to weigh a passenger if suspected to be in excess of the received weight & to leave baggage or passengers behind if the flight will be outside its w&bal limits with them.\nPilots do weight and balance calculations prior to all flights. \nScale is calibrated annually to ensure accurate readings.\n5.PPE: N/A",5,"B","II","Mostly effective","No additional controls","1. Audits of flight records","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9;  Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \nManagement of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;\nCivil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nAir Services Licensing Act 115 of 1990\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\nConvention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft Act 59 of 1993\nInternational Air Services Act 60 of 1993   \nTransportation of Dangerous Goods and substances Act","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",null,"Ultraviolet Rays",25.1,"Pilots & fuel support exposed to ultraviolet rays while flying","Health","Exposure to the sunrays","Pilots & fuel support","BU Manager","Daily","Eye/Skin damage / disease (e.g. skin cancer)\nSun burns","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative:Helicopter pilots are issued with helmets that have built inn sun visors\nUse of sunscreen\nEmployees issued with sun brim hats\nMedical surveillance\n5.PPE(Long overalls)\n\n",3,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional controls","1. Surveillance Medicals\n2. Behavioural Safety Observations","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3;\n  Environmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3 & 4; Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997, Sec: 7; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nNoise induced hearing loss regulation\n 32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \nManagement of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-285 Medical surveillance; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\nCivil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nAir Services Licensing Act 115 of 1990\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\nConvention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft Act 59 of 1993\nInternational Air Services Act 60 of 1993   ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
["Adhoc landing during operations","R",26,"Unidentified objects in some of landing areas",26,"Incident / Accident \n(Air crash) ","Safety","Misjudgement(size of LZ,slope,hidden objects…)\n","Employees\nPassengers\nMembers of the public","BU Manager","Ad hoc","Damage to aircraft affecting their ability to fly safely\nFatalities to the occupants","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative: Preselection of land zone by team leaders or Fuel support drivers.\nTraining of Pilots on selection of landing zones. \nRefresher training for Pilots(proficiency checks)\n5.PPE: N/A",5,"B","II","Fully effective","No additional controls","1. Incidents rates per year. \n2. Audits of training records","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9;  Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;\nCivil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nAir Services Licensing Act 115 of 1990\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\nConvention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft Act 59 of 1993\nInternational Air Services Act 60 of 1993   ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
["Helicopter Live line flying","R",28,"Ergonomics\n(Poor Posture)",28,"Pilots constantly have to lean sideways to see live line workers and equipment below the helicopter","Health","The need to see the people / equipment below the helicopter","Helicopter Pilots","BU Manager","Daily when doing live line duties(± 4 hours)","Musculoskeletal disorders developing after few years of prolonged exposure","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative:Pilots are required to take a break after three hours worked.\nAdherence to the operations manual & flight authorisation sheets\nPilots undergo medical surveillance periodically\nTraining on ergonomics\n5.PPE: N/A",4,"C","II","Mostly effective","No additional controls","1. Medical surveillance reports.","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; Environmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3 & 4; Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997, Sec: 7; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nErgonomics regulation\n 32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \n32-285 Medical surveillance; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;\nCivil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nAir Services Licensing Act 115 of 1990\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\nConvention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft Act 59 of 1993\nInternational Air Services Act 60 of 1993   ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",30,"Exposure to dangerous Goods",30,"Inhalation of Smoke or Fumes ","Health","Exposure during refuelling activities","Employees\nPassengers\nMembers of the public","BU Manager","Daily","Temporary discomfort(irritation of respiratory tract)\nPossible long term respiratory tract disorders ","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative:Task specific risk assessment\nPilots to brief passengers not to be close during refuelling\nTraining on Dangerous goods & HCS for fuel support\nPeriodic medical surveillance\n5.PPE: PPE as per task specific risk assessment",3,"B","III","Fully effective","No additional controls","Behavioural Safety Observations\n","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3;\nCompensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nHazardous Chemical agents regulation\n 32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \nManagement of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-285 Medical surveillance; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n240-120054284:Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Standard\n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and  ","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",31,"Exposure Jet A-1 Fuel",31,"Jet A-1 fuel coming into contact with skin","Health","Spillage of Jet A-1 fuel on skin and prolonged exposure of the skin to Jet A-1 Fuel","Pilots and Senior Officials Non-technically ","BU Manager","Daily\n(±3 hours)","Skin irritation / Injury (chemical burns if exposed for long)","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4. Administrative: Task specific risk assessment\nTraining and use of refuelling procedure\nAll employees are reminded that if they spill Jet A-1 fuel on their skin they must wash the affected area with soap and water immediately; remove contaminated clothing and shoes; wash and dry clothing before reuse; and seek medical advice if skin become red swollen or painful.\n5: PPE: PPE as per risk assessment\n ",3,"C","II","Fully effective","No additional controls\n","1. Near Miss and Incident reports","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9;   \n; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nHazardous chemical agents regulation\n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure;  \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;\n240-120054284:Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Standard \nEskom Aviation refuelling procedure","N/A","Complete","N/A"]
[null,"R",32,"Exposure to Jet A-1 Fuel",32,"Inhalation of fumes","Health","Refuelling process (fumes escaping from the nozzle of the pipe or helicopter)","Pilots and Fuel Support drivers","BU Manager","Daily\n(±3 hours)","Respiratory tract disorders ","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative:\nDangerous Goods training\nTask specific risk assessment with Live\nRefuelling procedure\nAnnual Medical Surveillance\n5: PPE: Respiratory protection",3,"C","II","Fully effective","Conduct HCS(Jet A1 fuel) surveys","1. Behavioural Safety Observations\n2. Medical surveillance\n","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3;\nFacilities Regulations, 2004, Sec: 8;  \nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3 & 4; Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997, Sec: 7; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nEskom Aviation refuelling procedure\n 32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \nManagement of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-285 Medical surveillance; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure;\n240-120054284:Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Standard \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and   ","2023-06-01","In Progress"]
[null,"R",33,"Hot Refuelling",33,"Exposure to Noise and Jet A1 fumes","Health","Fuel support drivers refuelling when the helicopter engine is running (idling)","Fuel Support Drivers\nPilots","BU Manager","Weekly(2 hours)","Noise Induced Hearing Loss\nRespiratory tract disorders ","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4. Administrative: Task specific risk assessment with Live line\nDangerous Goods training\nRefuelling procedure\nAnnual Medical Surveillance\nPilots and drivers are trained to select of landing sites into wind to minimise inhalation of fumes\n5: PPE (Hearing Protection Devices)",4,"B","III","Fully effective","Conduct HCS(Jet A1 fuel) surveys","1. Behavioural Safety Observations\n2. Medical surveillance\n","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; General Safety Regulations, 1986  Sec: 2& 3;\nFacilities Regulations, 2004, Sec: 8;  \nEnvironmental Regulations for Workplaces (1987)  Sec: 3 & 4; Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997, Sec: 7; Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nNoise induced hearing loss regulation\nHazardous chemical agents regulation\n240-120054284:Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Standard\n 32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \nManagement of the Eskom Occupational Hygiene Approved Inspection Authority; \n32-285 Medical surveillance; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;\nCivil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\n","2023-06-01","In Progress","N/A"]
[null,"R",34,"Overfilling the tanker",34,"Jet A-1 spillage","Safety","1. Malfunctioning of the overfill valves\n2. Fuel support personnel not monitoring refuelling","Fuel Support Drivers\nThird party","BU Manager","Once a week","1. Environmental incidents\n2. Spillages","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative:Risk assessment prior to refuelling\nStop valves\nStandard operating procedures(refuelling procedures)\nReset overflow switches to a lower quantity\nOverfill sensors\nTop manual refuelling \nCalculation of the quantity of fuel needed before loading\nEach truck equipped with spill kits\nDangerous good training\nPPE: Overalls, safety boots,goggles,respiratory protection and glovers\n",2,"C","III","Fully effective","No additional controls","1. Incidents reports\n","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9; ; Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997, Sec: 7;  130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \nHazardous chemical agents regulation\n240-120054284:Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Standard\n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;\nEskom Aviation refuelling procedure\n\n","N/A","Complete\n","N/A"]
["Helicopter flight with door removed","R",35,"Loose items falling out of the helicopter into the tail rotor",35,"Accidents","Safety","Live line operations can only be performed with helicopter doors  removed\nAudit inspection performed with doors open","Helicopter Crew","BU Manager","Daily","1.Fatalities\n2. Property Damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative:Task specific risk assessment prior to flying\nTraining for the Pilots and Live line crew\nPilots check if there's no loose items in the aircraft\nBriefings to all crew(on board)\n5.PPE: Pilots PPE & Live line PPE",6,"B","I","Fully effective","No additional controls","Accident reports","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nNational environmental Management Act:\nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9;  Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nNoise induced hearing loss regulation\n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \n240-120054284:Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Standard\n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development ;Civil Aviation Act 13 of 2009   Amends\nAir Services Licensing Act 115 of 1990\nSouth African Civil Aviation Authority Levies Act 41 of 1998\nConvention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft Act 59 of 1993\nInternational Air Services Act 60 of 1993   ","N/A","Complete\n","N/A"]
["Fuel support drivers checking the top of the trucks & using top inlets to refuel","N",36,"Work at height",36,"Fall from height","Safety","Not being hooked up when climbing the ladder or while on top of the truck","Fuel support team","BU Manager","Ad hoc","1.Fatality\n2.Property damage","1. Elimination- Not possible\n2. Substitution-Not Possible\n3. Engineering controls-Not Possible\n4.Administrative:Task specific risk assessment\nTraining \nVisual Inspection of ladder, tools and equipment's prior to use \nBehavioural safety Observations\n4. Quarterly inspection of tools by LME\n5: PPE:Double hook system(PPE)\n",5,"B","II","Fully effective","No additional controls","Incident Reports","Aviation Manager","Occupational Health and Safety Act,  Act 85 of 1993 (OHS Act) Sec: 8, 14, 18 & 19; \nGeneral Administrative Regulations, 2003 Sec: 6, 7, 8 & 9;  Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, Act 130 of 1993 (COID) Sec: 22, 38, 39, 41, 42 & 43; 32-727\nNoise induced hearing loss regulation\n32-520 OHS Risk Assessment Procedure; \n32-95  Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Incident Management Procedure; \n32-407 Behavioural Safety Observations\n32-477 Safety Health and Environment Training and Development\n240-120054284:Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Standard\n","N/A","Complete\n","N/A"]
[]
["Remoted Pilots(Drones)"]

{"sheet":"Consequence rating","index":1,"n_rows":10,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":10}
[]
[null,null,"Consequence criteria "]
[null,"Consequence rating","Description"]
[null,null,"Health and Safety"]
[null,1,"No injuries or health effects(near misses)"]
[null,2,"First-aid treatment case,  and temporary discomfort case"]
[null,3,"Medical treatment case; occupational disease with reversible/non-permanent effect"]
[null,4,"Lost Time Injury. Irreversible health effects/occupational disease with permanent consequence "]
[null,5,"Fatality or life threatening health effects"]
[null,6,"Multiple fatalities "]

{"sheet":"Likelihood rating","index":2,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":6,"rows_kept":18,"merged":[[1,0,1,5],[2,4,2,5],[4,1,6,1],[4,2,6,2],[4,4,6,4],[4,5,6,5],[7,1,9,1],[7,2,9,2],[7,4,9,4],[7,5,9,5],[10,1,11,1],[10,2,11,2],[10,4,11,4],[10,5,11,5],[12,1,14,1],[12,2,14,2],[12,4,14,4],[12,5,14,5],[15,1,17,1],[15,2,17,2],[15,4,17,4],[15,5,17,5]]}
[]
["Likelihood criteria"]
[null,"Score","Descriptor","Safety","Occupational hygiene"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Exposure","Probability of exceeding OEL"]
[null,"A","Highly unlikely","§  More than a “100 year event” ","Rare (once a year)","No exposure (or exposure < 10% of OEL)"]
[{"$nulls":3},"§  Exceptionally unlikely, even in the long-term future"]
[{"$nulls":3},"§  < 5% probability."]
[null,"B","Unlikely","§  Could occur in “years to decades”","Short periods of time, a few times per day/ intermittent (once in six months, three months, or a month)","Low exposure (< 50% of OEL)"]
[{"$nulls":3},"§  May occur but not anticipated"]
[{"$nulls":3},"§  ≥ 5% and < 20% probability."]
[null,"C","Possible","§  Could occur within “months to years”","Continuous for between one and two hours (often/ weekly)","Moderate exposure (chronic exposure > 50% of OEL or acute exposure ≥ OEL)"]
[{"$nulls":3},"§  May occur shortly but a distinct probability it will not, or ≥ 20% and < 70% probability."]
[null,"D","Likely","§  Could occur within “weeks to months”","Continuous for between two and four hours (frequent/daily)","High exposure (chronic exposure > OEL, or exposure exceeding OEL-STEL)"]
[{"$nulls":3},"§  Balance of probability will occur"]
[{"$nulls":3},"§  ≥ 70% and < 90% probability."]
[null,"E","Unavoidable","§  Could occur within “days to weeks”","Continuous for eight-hour shift","Very high exposure (chronic exposure > 2 x OEL or exposure exceeding OEL-C)"]
[{"$nulls":3},"§  Impact is imminent"]
[{"$nulls":3},"§  ≥ 90% probability."]

{"sheet":"Risk control effectiveness","index":3,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":8,"merged":[[2,1,2,2]]}
[]
[]
[null,"RISK CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS GUIDE"]
[null,"             RCE","Guide"]
[null,"Fully effective","Nothing more to be done except review and monitor the existing controls. Controls are well designed for the risk, are largely preventive and address the root causes. Management believes that they are effective and reliable at all times. Reactive controls only support preventive controls."]
[null,"Mostly effective","Most controls are designed correctly and are in place and effective. Some more work to be done to improve operating effectiveness or management has doubts about operational effectiveness and reliability of the controls."]
[null,"Mostly ineffective","While the design of controls may be largely correct in that they treat most of the root causes of the risk, they are not currently operationally very effective. There may be an over-reliance on reactive controls, or some of the controls do not seem correctly designed in that they do not treat root causes."]
[null,"None","Virtually no credible control. Management has no confidence that any degree of control is being achieved."]

{"sheet":"Risk matrix","index":4,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":17,"merged":[[1,4,1,8],[2,2,7,2],[9,4,9,8],[12,5,12,6],[13,5,13,6],[14,5,14,6],[15,5,15,6],[16,5,16,6]]}
[]
[{"$nulls":4},"RISK MATRIX"]
[null,null,"Consequences",6,"I","I","I","I","I"]
[{"$nulls":3},5,"II","II","II","I","I"]
[{"$nulls":3},4,"III","III","II","I","I"]
[{"$nulls":3},3,"IV","III","II","II","I"]
[{"$nulls":3},2,"IV","IV","III","II","II"]
[{"$nulls":3},1,"IV","IV","III","III","III"]
[{"$nulls":4},"A","B","C","D","E"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Likelihood"]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"Priority","Risk ranking","Action required"]
[{"$nulls":3},"I","Very high","Immediate action required, and these risks to be captured on IRM system."]
[{"$nulls":3},"II","High","Strong mandatory action required, and these risks to be captured on IRM system."]
[{"$nulls":3},"III","Medium","Action required, possibly at administrative level."]
[{"$nulls":3},"IV","Low","Minor or no action required."]