{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":2,"sheets":["Main","for DRe"],"not_rendered":{"defined_names":2},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Main","index":0,"n_rows":13,"n_cols":10,"rows_kept":13,"merged":[[2,0,3,0],[4,0,5,0],[6,0,7,0],[8,0,10,0]]}
["Area","Sub Area","Response Form Section Reference","Measure","Rating Options","Met","Max","Score","Comments"]
["WAN","Redundancy","3.1","Bidders must provide confirmation in the response form and describing how their solution ensures:\n\nRedundant WAN connectivity up to Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) level\nAutomatic failover between primary and secondary connections\nThe design and mechanisms used to achieve failover, including how continuity of service is maintained\n\nThe redundancy design up to CPE level (e.g., dual links, dual CPE, diverse routing)\nThe failover mechanism (e.g., automatic switching, protocols, detection and recovery approach)\nAny additional redundancy measures implemented beyond the minimum requirement","Requirements Exceeded: 15 POINTS\nThe bidder confirms redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links, dual CPE, diverse routing as well as additional redundant routes.\n\nRequirements met:  10 POINTS\nThe bidder confirms redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links, dual CPE, diverse routing\n\nRequirements partially met: 4 POINTS\nThe bidder is unable to confirm redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links and dual CPE, however diverse routing is confirmed. \n\nRequirements not met: 0 POINTS\nThe bidder is unable to confirm redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links and dual CPE and diverse routing\n",10,15,null,null,"l"]
["Corporate Internet","Diversity","4.1","Bidder must confirm and provide proof of at least two international breakouts agreements.             ","Requirements Exceeded:     13 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                      \nBidder confirmed and provided proof of more than two international breakouts agreements.                                             \n\nRequirements fully met:    8 POINTS\nBidder confirmed and provided proof of a minimum of two international breakouts agreements.                                                               \n\nRequirements partially met:     1 POINTS\nBidder confirmed and provided proof of only one international breakouts agreements.       \n\nRequirements not met: 0 POINTS\nBidder failed to provide any information",8,13]
[null,"Redundancy","4.2","Bidders must provide confirmation in the response form and describe how their solution ensures:\n\nRedundant Corporate Internet connectivity up to Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) level\nAutomatic failover between primary and secondary connections\nThe design and mechanisms used to achieve failover, including how continuity of service is maintained\n\nThe redundancy design up to CPE level (e.g., dual links, dual CPE, diverse routing)\nThe failover mechanism (e.g., automatic switching, protocols, detection and recovery approach)\nAny additional redundancy measures implemented beyond the minimum requirement","Requirement Exceeded         12 POINTS\nThe bidder confirms redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links, dual CPE, diverse routing as well as additional redundant routes.\n\nRequirement Met:                8 POINTS\nThe bidder confirms redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links, dual CPE, diverse routing\n                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            \nRequirement partially met:       1 POINTS\nThe bidder is unable to confirm redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links and dual CPE, however diverse routing is confirmed. \n                                                                                                                                                                              \nRequirements not met: 0 POINTS\nThe bidder is unable to confirm redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links and dual CPE and diverse routing",8,12]
["Voice Carrier Services","TMS","5.1","Require a TMS (Telephone Management System) \n-That is Web based.  \n-Integrate with MS Teams and report on MS Teams calls \n-Allows role based access via AD. \n-That allows a user extension to be barred once a designated budget is exceeded \n-Allow for up to 10 different classes of services, i.e. If a user is barred, he should be returned to the same call privilege before he was barred (Provide a screenshot and explanation of how the functionality is met)","Requirements Exceeded:   12 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                            \nThe Bidder has shown how they meet all the below requirements and exceed the requirements:          \n                                                                                \nRequirements met:          10 POINTS\nBidder has provided  proof (screenshot and explanation) showing how the TMS system will meet ALL the requirements.\nTMS system is Web based.\nIntegrate with MS Teams and report on MS Teams calls and allows role based access via AD. \nThat allows a user extension to be barred once a designated budget is exceeded \nAllow for up to 10 different classes of services, i.e.. If a user is barred, he should be returned to the same call privilege before he was barred          \n                                                                              \nRequirements partially met:         3 POINTS\nBidder does meet all of the requirements  below :\nTMS system is Web based.\nIntegrate with MS Teams and report on MS Teams calls and allows role based access via AD. \nThat allows a user extension to be barred once a designated budget is exceeded \nAllow for up to 10 different classes of services, i.e.. If a user is barred, he should be returned to the same call privilege before he was barred  \n\nRequirements not met:       0 POINTS\nBidder failed to provide any information                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ",10,12]
[null,"Redundancy","5.2","Bidders must provide confirmation in the response form and describing how their solution ensures:\n\nRedundant Voice Carrier Services connectivity up to Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) level\nAutomatic failover between primary and secondary connections\nThe design and mechanisms used to achieve failover, including how continuity of service is maintained\n\nThe redundancy design up to CPE level (e.g., dual links, dual CPE, diverse routing)\nThe failover mechanism (e.g., automatic switching, protocols, detection and recovery approach)\nAny additional redundancy measures implemented beyond the minimum requirement","Requirement Exceeded         12 POINTS\nThe bidder confirms redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links, dual CPE, diverse routing as well as additional redundant routes.\n\nRequirement Met:                8 POINTS\nThe bidder confirms redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links, dual CPE, diverse routing\n                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            \nRequirement partially met:       1 POINTS\nThe bidder is unable to confirm redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links and dual CPE, however diverse routing is confirmed. \n                                                                                                                                                                              \nRequirements not met: 0 POINTS\nThe bidder is unable to confirm redundancy up to CPE level by confirming dual links and dual CPE and diverse routing                                                                                                           ",8,12]
["General Functional Requirements","Monitoring","6.1","Require 24/7/365 monitoring solution, \n• real time reporting and \n• historical reporting, \n• showing Availability, \n• link status and \n• utilization \nFor each of the following services:\n•\tWAN services\n•\tCorporate Internet Services \n•\tVoice Carrier services\nProvide screenshots of monitoring solution showing how the above requirements will be met.","Requirement Exceeded         8 POINTS               \nBidder provided proof of a  24/7/365 monitoring, real time reporting and historical reporting, showing Availability, link status and utilization \nand advanced functionality shown such as data analytics, predictive fault finding for each of the following service:\n•\tWAN services\n•\tCorporate Internet Services \n•\tVoice Carrier services                                                                                                                                                         \n\nRequirement Met:                5 POINTS               \nBidder provided proof of a 24/7/365 monitoring solution, real time reporting and historical reporting, showing Availability, link status and utilization \nFor each of the following services:\n•\tWAN services\n•\tCorporate Internet Services \n•\tVoice Carrier services        \n                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          \nRequirements partially met:       2 POINTS       \nBidder did not provide proof of a 24/7/365 monitoring solution, real time reporting and historical reporting, showing Availability, link status and utilization \nFor each of the following services:\n•\tWAN services\n•\tCorporate Internet Services \n•\tVoice Carrier services\n\nRequirements not met:       0 POINTS\nBidder failed to provide any information         ",5,8,null," "]
[null,"Call logging","6.2","Bidder to confirm that there is a 24/7/365 call logging process in place. Details to be provided:\n•\tDetails of NOC\n•\tLocation of NOC\n•\tContact Details of NOC\n•\tEscalation Process\n•\tOperational times of NOC"," Requirements Exceeded:          8 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         \nBidder confirmed that there is a 24/7/365 call logging process in place, provided the below details and exceeded the requirements, e.g. Integration into ACSA call logging system to automatically log calls or other advanced functionality\n•\tDetails of NOC\n•\tLocation of NOC\n•\tContact Details of NOC\n•\tEscalation Process\n•\tOperational times of NOC\n\nRequirements Fully Met:       6 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          \n Bidder confirmed that there is a 24/7/365 call logging process in place. Details provided for:\n•\tDetails of NOC\n•\tLocation of NOC\n•\tContact Details of NOC\n•\tEscalation Process\n•\tOperational times of NOC\n\nRequirements partially met:            3 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                \nBidder is unable confirm that there is a 24/7/365 call logging process in place or not all of the following details provided.\n•\tDetails of NOC\n•\tLocation of NOC\n•\tContact Details of NOC\n•\tEscalation Process\n•\tOperational times of NOC               \nRequirements not met:       0 POINTS\nBidder failed to provide any information                                                                                                                                                                                       .                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         ",6,8,null," "]
["Project Implementation","Project Plan","7.1","Provide detailed separate project implementation plans in each of the following scopes: \n•\tWAN Infrastructure\n•\tCorporate Internet Services\n•\tPublic Internet Services\n•\tPoint to Point Long distance Fibre links (provisionally only for links between JNB and CPT)\n•\tVoice Carrier Services. \n•\tFTTH Services\nThe project plan Implementation timeline should not exceed 12 months","Requirement exceeded:    12 POINTS\nThe bidder has provided detailed separate project implementation plans that meet the requirements, in each of the following scopes: \n•\tWAN Infrastructure\n•\tCorporate Internet Services\n•\tPublic Internet Services\n•\tPoint to Point Long distance Fibre links (provisionally only for links between JNB and CPT)\n•\tVoice Carrier Services. \n•\tFTTH Services\nProject Implementation timeline is not more than 6 months\n\nRequirement met:            10 POINTS\nThe bidder has provided detailed separate project implementation plans that meet the requirements, in each of the following scopes: \n•\tWAN Infrastructure\n•\tCorporate Internet Services\n•\tPublic Internet Services\n•\tPoint to Point Long distance Fibre links (provisionally only for links between JNB and CPT)\n•\tVoice Carrier Services. \n•\tFTTH Services\n Project Implementation timeline is more than 6 months but not more than 12 months\n                                                                                    \nRequirement partially met:    3   POINTS\nThe Bidders project plan does not meet all the requirements or project plans for all the required services are not provided, or project timelines exceed 12 months\n\nRequirements not met:       0 POINTS\nBidder failed to provide any information       ",10,12,null," "]
[null,"Project Managers","7.2","The Bidder must provide a minimum of two (2) Project Managers.\nEach Project Manager must have:\n\nA valid PMI PMP or APMG Prince2 Practitioner certification\nA minimum of two (2) years’ experience each on IT/Telecoms projects\n\nMandatory Evidence\n\nNo CVs will be accepted\nExperience must be proven through client reference letter/s\nEach reference letter must:\nClearly name the Project Manager/s\nConfirm their role and involvement in IT/Telecoms projects\nDemonstrate the number of years of experience claimed","Requirement exceeded:    4 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                              \nThree (3) or more Project Managers are provided, each with valid certification and minimum of two (2) years’ experience, supported by client reference letter/s.                                                     \n\nRequirement met:         3 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      \nTwo (2) Project Managers are provided, each with valid certification and minimum of two (2) years’ experience, supported by client reference letter/s.                                                                                                                                                                  \n \nRequirement partially met:    1 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  \nOne (1) Project Manager are provided,  each with valid certification and minimum of two (2) years’ experience, supported by client reference letter/s.\n\nRequirements not met:       0 POINTS\nBidder failed to provide any information  that meets the requirements    ",3,4,null," "]
[null,"Technical Resources","7.3","The Bidder must provide technical resources assigned to this project, covering the following service areas:\n\nWAN / SD-WAN Infrastructure\nInternet Services\nVoice Carrier Services\n\nMinimum Resource Requirements\nThe Bidder must provide:\n\nAt least one (1) resource with a valid:\nCCIE-RS or CCIE-SP certification (or equivalent OEM certification)\nAt least one (1) resource with a valid:\nCertified Solutions Architect certification on OEM networking devices (e.g., CCDP or equivalent)\n\nEach resource must have a minimum of two (2) years’ post-certification experience, proven by client reference letters\n\nEquivalent Certification Requirement\nWhere equivalent certifications are submitted, the Bidder must:\n- Provide a clear written explanation demonstrating equivalence to the specified certification\n- Show that the certification is relevant to the same technical domain and level of expertise\nIf equivalence is not clearly demonstrated, the certification will not be accepted\n\nMandatory Evidence\n-Valid certification(s) for each resource\nClient reference letters that:\n-Clearly name the resource\n-Confirm their role in relevant networking / IT telecoms projects\n-Confirm post-certification experience (in years)\n-Where applicable, equivalency justification document","Requirement exceeded:    4 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                              \nMore than the minimum number of specified required resources are provided, including multiple CCIE and/or certified Solutions Architect resources (or approved equivalents), each with minimum of two (2) years’ post-certification experience, supported by reference letters.\n\nRequirement met:         2 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      \nMinimum requirements are met: at least one CCIE-certified resource and one certified Solutions Architect resource (or approved equivalents), each with minimum of two (2) years’ post-certification experience, supported by reference letters.\n\nRequirement partially met:    1 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  \nEither one CCIE-certified resource or one Solutions Architect-certified resource (or approved equivalents), each with minimum of two (2) years’ post-certification experience, supported by reference letters.\n\nRequirements not met:       0 POINTS\nNo relevant information provided.      ",2,4,null," "]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"Minimum Score required is 70","Bidders score",{"$f":"SUM(F2:F11)","v":70},{"$f":"SUM(G2:G11)","v":100},{"$f":"SUM(H2:H11)","v":0}]

{"sheet":"for DRe","index":1,"n_rows":13,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":13,"merged":[[2,0,3,0],[4,0,6,0],[7,0,8,0],[9,0,11,0],[12,0,12,2]]}
["Area","Sub Area","Response Form Section Reference","Measure","Rating Options"]
["WAN/SDWAN","Redundancy","1.1.1","Provide details of geographical diversity and redundancy, and elimination of a single point of failure for primary and secondary WAN services at each of the sites by showing an intended last mile route diagram from the individual POPs to the airport that shows diverse paths.","Requirements Exceeded: 16 POINTS\nDiagram shows diverse patches from all POPs to EACH of the sites as stipulated in Table 1 of the SOW. and exceeded this requirement by showing more than two paths that can be used for geographic redundancy at  the four major airports, JNB, CPT, DUR and PLZ\n\nRequirements met:  12 POINTS\nDiagram shows diverse patches from all POPs to EACH of the sites as stipulated in Table 1 of the SOW.   \n\nRequirements not met: 0 POINTS\nDiagram fails to show diverse patches from all POPs to EACH of the sites as stipulated in Table 1 of the SOW."]
["Corporate Internet","Internet redundancy","1.2.2","Bidder to confirm a minimum of two international breakouts. Provide proof in the form of international connectivity peering agreements.","Requirements Exceeded:     12 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                      \nBidder confirmed and provided proof of more than two international breakouts agreements.                                             \n\nRequirements fully met:    10 POINTS\nBidder confirmed and provided proof of a minimum of two international breakouts agreements.                                                               \n\nRequirements not met:     0 POINTS\nBidder did not confirm or did not provide proof of a minimum of two international breakouts agreements."]
[null,"Resilience","1.2.3","Bidder provider to confirm redundancy and automatic failover for Corporate Internet, provide proof in the form of , architecture diagram showing redundancy up to CPE level and explanation of how automatic failover will take place.","Requirement Exceeded         12 POINTS\nBidder has provided architecture diagram showing redundancy up to CPE level and explanation of how automatic failover will take place with additional redundant options provided.\n\nRequirement Met:                10 POINTS\nBidder provided  architecture diagram showing redundancy up to CPE level and explanation of how automatic failover will take place.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 \n                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Requirement not Met:          0 POINTS\nBidder has not provided architecture diagram showing redundancy up to CPE level and explanation of how automatic failover will take place.                                                                                                                                                                                   "]
["Voice Carrier Services","TMS","1.3.1","Require a TMS (Telephone Management System) \n-That is Web based.  \n-Integrate with MS Teams and report on MS Teams calls \n-Allows role based access via AD. \n-That allows a user extension to be barred once a designated budget is exceeded \n-Allow for up to 10 different classes of services, i.e. If a user is barred, he should be returned to the same call privilege before he was barred (Provide a screenshot and explanation of how the functionality is met)","Requirements Exceeded:   12 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                            \nThe Bidder has shown how they meet all the below requirements and exceed the requirements:          \n                                                                                \nRequirements met:          10 POINTS\nBidder has provided provided proof (screenshot and explanation) showing how the TMS system will meet ALL the requirements.\nTMS system is Web based.\nIntegrate with MS Teams and report on MS Teams calls and allows role based access via AD. \nThat allows a user extension to be barred once a designated budget is exceeded \nAllow for up to 10 different classes of services, i.e.. If a user is barred, he should be returned to the same call privilege before he was barred          \n                                                                              \nRequirements not met:         0 POINTS\nBidder does meet all of the requirements                                                                                                                                                                                                                       "]
[null,"Resilience","1.3.2","Bidder provider to confirm redundancy and automatic failover, provide proof in the form of , architecture diagram showing redundancy up to CPE level and explanation of how automatic failover will take place.","Requirement Exceeded         8 POINTS\nBidder has provided architecture diagram showing redundancy up to CPE level and explanation of how automatic failover will take place with additional redundant options provided.\n\nRequirement Met:                7 POINTS\nBidder provided  architecture diagram showing redundancy up to CPE level and explanation of how automatic failover will take place.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 \n                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Requirement not Met:          0 POINTS\nBidder has not provided architecture diagram showing redundancy up to CPE level and explanation of how automatic failover will take place.                                                                                                                                                                                   "]
[null,"Bandwidth requirements","1.3.3","Requirement as per the SOW for Voice Services, Bidder to provide signed commitment, that they meet the bandwidth requirements for\n•\tDedicated bandwidth as per the minimum requirements in SOW, Section 3.5 SIP trunking bandwidth required.\n","Requirements Exceeded:       4 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                \n•\tThe Bidder has shown how they exceed the the dedicated bandwidth requirements for all sites\n\nRequirements fully met:        2 POINTS\nBidder has confirmed that the following requirements for Corporate Internet is met\n•\tDedicated bandwidth\n\nRequirements not met:        0 POINTS\nOne or more of the requirements have not been met"]
["General Functional Requirements","Monitoring","1.5.1","Require 24/7/365 monitoring solution, \n• real time reporting and \n• historical reporting, \n• showing Availability, \n• link status and \n• utilization \nFor each of the following services:\n•\tWAN services\n•\tCorporate Internet Services \n•\tVoice Carrier services\nProvide screenshots of monitoring solution and explanation of how the above requirements will be met.","Requirement Exceeded         8 POINTS               \nBidder provided proof of a  24/7/365 monitoring, real time reporting and historical reporting, showing Availability, link status and utilization \nand advanced functionality shown such as data analytics, predictive fault finding for each of the following service:\n•\tWAN services\n•\tCorporate Internet Services \n•\tVoice Carrier services                                                                                                                                                         \n                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Requirement Met:                7 POINTS               \nBidder provided proof of a 24/7/365 monitoring solution, real time reporting and historical reporting, showing Availability, link status and utilization \nFor each of the following services:\n•\tWAN services\n•\tCorporate Internet Services \n•\tVoice Carrier services                                                                                                                                               \n                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Requirement not Met:          0 POINTS               \nBidder provided proof of a 24/7/365 monitoring solution, real time reporting and historical reporting, showing Availability, link status and utilization \nFor each of the following services:\n•\tWAN services\n•\tCorporate Internet Services \n•\tVoice Carrier services"]
[null,"Call logging","1.5.2","Bidder to confirm that there is a 24/7/365 call logging process in place. Details to provided:\n•\tDetails of NOC\n•\tLocation of NOC\n•\tContact Details of NOC\n•\tEscalation Process\n•\tOperational times of NOC"," Requirements Exceeded:          8 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Bidder confirmed that there is a 24/7/365 call logging process in place, provided the below details and exceeded the requirements, e.g. Integration into ACSA call logging system to automatically log calls or other advanced functionality\n•\tDetails of NOC\n•\tLocation of NOC\n•\tContact Details of NOC\n•\tEscalation Process\n•\tOperational times of NOC\n\nRequirements Fully Met:       7 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Bidder confirmed that there is a 24/7/365 call logging process in place. Details provided for:\n•\tDetails of NOC\n•\tLocation of NOC\n•\tContact Details of NOC\n•\tEscalation Process\n•\tOperational times of NOC\n\nRequirements not met:            0 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Bidder is unable confirm that there is a 24/7/365 call logging process in place or not all of the following details provided.\n•\tDetails of NOC\n•\tLocation of NOC\n•\tContact Details of NOC\n•\tEscalation Process\n•\tOperational times of NOC                                                                                                                                                                                             .                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         "]
["Project Implementation","Project Plan","1.6.1","Provide detailed separate project implementation plans in each of the following scopes: \n•\tWAN Infrastructure\n•\tCorporate Internet Services\n•\tPublic Internet Services\n•\tPoint to Point Long distance Fibre links (provisionally only for links between JNB and CPT)\n•\tVoice Carrier Services. \n•\tFTTH Services\nThe project plan requirements are:\n• Executive Overview\n• Major Tasks\n• Milestones\n• Resource Allocation\n• Project Implementation timeline should not exceed 12 months","Requirement exceeded:    12 POINTS\nThe bidder has provided detailed separate project implementation plans that meet the requirements, in each of the following scopes: \n•\tWAN Infrastructure\n•\tCorporate Internet Services\n•\tPublic Internet Services\n•\tPoint to Point Long distance Fibre links (provisionally only for links between JNB and CPT)\n•\tVoice Carrier Services. \n•\tFTTH Services\nThe project plan requirements are:\n• Executive Overview, • Major Tasks, • Milestones, • Resource Allocation, • Project Implementation timeline does not exceed 6 months\n\nRequirement met:            11 POINTS\nThe bidder has provided detailed separate project implementation plans that meet the requirements, in each of the following scopes: \n•\tWAN Infrastructure\n•\tCorporate Internet Services\n•\tPublic Internet Services\n•\tPoint to Point Long distance Fibre links (provisionally only for links between JNB and CPT)\n•\tVoice Carrier Services. \n•\tFTTH Services\nThe project plan requirements are:\n• Executive Overview, • Major Tasks, • Milestones, • Resource Allocation, • Project Implementation timeline should not exceed 12 months    \n                                                                                            \nRequirement not met:    0   POINTS\nThe Bidders project plan does not meet all the requirements or project plans for all the required services are not provided, or project timelines exceed 12 months"]
[null,"Project Managers","1.6.2","The bidder is required to provide a  minimum two Project Managers \nProvide proof of valid PMI PMP or APMG Prince 2 Practitioner certification AND a minimum of 5 years’ experience Please do not provide CV’s. Prove years of experience via contactable client reference letters for It Telecoms projects  worked on. The reference letter MUST refer to the resource of whose certification is provided.","Requirement exceeded:    4 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                              \nMore than 2 resources supplied with valid PMI PMP or APMG Prince 2 Practitioner certification AND a minimum of 5 years’ experience via contactable client reference letters for It Telecoms projects  worked on.                                                                                                                                                                                                                              \n\nRequirement met:         2 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      \nBidder provided proof of valid PMI PMP or APMG Prince 2 Practitioner certification AND a minimum of 5 years’ experience via contactable client reference letters for It Telecoms projects  worked on.                                                                                                                                                                               \n \nRequirement not met:    0 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  \nBidder did not provide proof of valid PMI PMP or APMG Prince 2 Practitioner certification or a minimum of 5 years’ experience via contactable client reference letters for It Telecoms projects  worked on.     "]
[null,"Technical Resources","1.6.2","The Bidder is required to provide technical resources that will be assigned to this project with defined roles in each of the following scopes: WAN/SDWAN Infrastructure, Internet Services, Voice Carrier Services. \n1. At least 1x resource with CCIE-RS/CCIE-SP or equivalent OEM certification\n2. At least 1 x Certified Solutions Architect on OEM vendor networking devices (CCDP or equivalent)\n3. Prove proof of at least 3 years post certification experience","Requirement exceeded:    4 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                              \nMore than 2 resources supplied with certified CCIE-RS/CCIE-SP and  Solutions Architect or equivalent AND a minimum of 3 years’ experience.\n\nRequirement met:         2 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      \nBidder provided proof of valid  certified CCIE-RS/CCIE-SP and  Solutions Architect or equivalent  AND a minimum of 3 years’ experience via contactable \n\nRequirement not met:    0 POINTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  \nBidder has not provided proof of valid  certified CCIE-RS/CCIE-SP and  Solutions Architect or equivalent  AND a minimum of 3 years’ experience."]
["Minimum score required is 80"]