{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Quality Evaluation"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Quality Evaluation","index":0,"n_rows":22,"n_cols":34,"rows_kept":22,"merged":[[6,2,6,15],[7,2,7,3],[7,4,7,5],[8,2,11,3],[13,18,13,19],[13,22,13,23],[14,2,14,7],[14,18,14,19],[14,22,14,23],[15,2,15,7],[15,10,15,11],[15,14,15,15],[16,2,16,7],[16,10,16,11],[16,12,16,13],[16,14,16,15],[21,2,24,8],[21,10,21,11],[21,14,24,15],[22,10,22,11],[23,10,23,11],[24,10,24,11]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[{"$nulls":3},0,"Do Not Meet",{"$nulls":22},"MAX",null,"Not applicable",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0.49,"d":"49%"},"NOT MEET","0-49"]
[{"$nulls":3},1,"Partial Meet (large gap) ",{"$nulls":22},{"v":0,"d":"0%"},0,"Do Not Meet",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},{"v":0.59,"d":"59%"},"PARTIAL MEET","50-59"]
[{"$nulls":3},2,"Partial Meet (small gap)",{"$nulls":22},{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},1,"Partial Meet",{"v":0.6,"d":"60%"},{"v":0.69,"d":"69%"},"PARTIAL MEET","60-69"]
[{"$nulls":3},3,"Meet",{"$nulls":22},{"v":0.75,"d":"75%"},2,"Partial Meet",{"v":0.7,"d":"70%"},100,"MEET","70-100"]
[{"$nulls":27},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},3,"Meet"]
[{"$nulls":27},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},"X","Not applicable"]
[null,null,"Quality Evaluation Criteria for Enquiry: E2372GXNOU Q4/L3 - Batch 1 Plastic"]
[null,null,"Requirement",null,"Criteria",null,"Deliverable","Scoring Methodology","Weighting",null," Rating","% Rating","% Score",null,"[ Supplier Name ] Response","Eskom Comments"]
[null,null,"1. QUALITY REQUIREMENTS",null,"A Quality Assurance Program that meets the requirements of 238-103 Rev 3 as identified in 238-769T.","The returnable is a document or method statement describing the supplier Quality Programme that provide a description of the processes and supporting information that reflects how processes are managed and work/operation is prepared, reviewed, carried out, recorded, assessed and improved . Examples of processes to be described can include Resource Selection, Quality Control, Receipt Inspection, Purchasing, etc.","The returnable is a document or method statement describing the supplier Quality Programme that provide a description of the processes and supporting information that reflects how processes are managed and work/operation is prepared, reviewed, carried out, recorded, assessed and improved . Examples of processes to be described can include Resource Selection, Quality Control, Receipt Inspection, Purchasing, etc.","100% - Conformance with the requirements of 238-103 Rev 3\n75% - Minor gaps identified with conformance with the requirements of 238-103 Rev 3\n50% - Major gaps identified with conformance with the requirements of 238-103 Rev 3\n0% - No documents submitted",{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Manufacturer Quality Control Process Documents",null,"Returnable is an example of a QCP or Quality Project Plan for a similar service or product, identifying sequential operations and indicating inspection and test points (hold and/or witness points) and areas where reports are required .","100% - Quality Control Process procedure and Quality Control Plan with all intervention points and verification of completed steps.\n75% - Quality Control Process procedure and Quality Control Plan with no intervention points identified.\n50% - Quality Control Process procedure only submitted.\n0% - No documents submitted",{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Control of nonconforming product or service and application for concession.","Returnable is an example of a QCP or Quality Project Plan for a similar service or product, identifying sequential operations and indicating inspection and test points (hold and/or witness points) and areas where reports are required .","Tenderer to submit procedure, process document and records demonstrating implementation of Non-conformance and Corrective Action Process.","100% - Supplier Method Statement and/or Non-conformance and Corrective Action procedure and retained documented information (record) demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. Non-conformance report with Corrective Actions.\n75% - Supplier Method Statement and/or Non-conformance and Corrective Action procedure and retained documented information (record) demonstrating criteria implementation.\n50% - Method Statement or documented procedure that defines processes followed for dealing with nonconforming product/service.\n0% - No documents submitted",{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Supplier Monitoring Process, including Source Verification and Receipt Inspection.","Returnable is an example of a QCP or Quality Project Plan for a similar service or product, identifying sequential operations and indicating inspection and test points (hold and/or witness points) and areas where reports are required .","Tenderer to submit procedure, process document and records demonstrating implementation of Monitoring Processes.","100% - Supplier Method Statement and/or Monitoring procedure and retained documented information (record) demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. Source Verification or Receipt Inspection.\n75% - Supplier Method Statement and/or Monitoring procedure and retained documented information (record) demonstrating criteria implementation.\n50% - Method Statement or documented procedure that defines processes followed for verification and inspection of product.\n0% - No documents submitted",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":3},{"v":0.9999999999999999,"d":"100%"},null,"NOT MEET",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"$nulls":4},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[]
[null,null,"Final Analysis"]
[null,null,"1. QUALITY REQUIREMENTS",{"$nulls":5},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"},null,null,{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[null,null,"TOTAL",{"$nulls":5},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"NOT RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"RE-EVALUATE",{"$nulls":6},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"},null,null,{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[]
[null,null,"The scoring of the Functional Evaluation is conducted as follows:\nA supplier is given a score in each of the sub-categories. These sub-categories are requirements detailed in the specification or contract. Scores are allocated as follows:\n0 - 0% -    Does not meet \n1 - 50% -  Partial meet (Large gap) \n2 - 75% - Partial Meet (Small gap)\n3 - 100% - Meet\nThe score is then summed to a weighted average per category. The category scores are analysed as follows:\n0%     - 79%   - Does not meet\n80%   - 100% - Meet",{"$nulls":11},"Compiled by:\n\n\nSignature:\n\n\nDate:"]