{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":2,"sheets":["Mandatory Requirements","Phase a - Functional evaluation"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Mandatory Requirements","index":0,"n_rows":16,"n_cols":14,"rows_kept":16,"merged":[[6,2,6,7],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,11,3],[13,2,13,4]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[{"$nulls":3},0,"Do Not Meet",{"$nulls":4},"Not applicable",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0.69,"d":"69%"},"NOT MEET","0-69"]
[{"$nulls":3},1,"Partial Meet",{"$nulls":3},0,"Do Not Meet",{"v":0.7,"d":"70%"},{"v":0.79,"d":"79%"},"PARTIAL MEET","70-79"]
[{"$nulls":3},2,"Meet",{"$nulls":3},1,"Partial Meet",{"v":0.8,"d":"80%"},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},"MEET","80 - 100"]
[{"$nulls":3},3,"Exceed",{"$nulls":3},2,"Meet",{"v":1.01,"d":"101%"},110,"EXCEED","101-110"]
[{"$nulls":8},3,"Exceed"]
[{"$nulls":8},"X","Not applicable"]
[null,null,"Mandatory Requirements for Functional Evaluation for Radiography service suppliers              Enquiry No: WCKBG2431SB"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Requirements","Deliverable","Criteria","Meet / Not Meet"]
[null,null,"Mandatory requirements",null,"Radiography Source Availablility (X-ray Machine, CP-unit, Iridium, Cobolt, etc)","Source Holder Licences","Meet - licence for X-ray and Gamma-ray\nNot Meet - no license                                                                                                                                                                                              "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Radiography Facility in Cape Town","DOH Approval","Meet - Facility in CT with DOH approval\nNot Meet - < No CT facility                                                                                                                                                                   "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Company Registration as Source Holder","Proof of Registrations","Meet - Registered with proof provided\nNot Meet - Not registered                                                                                                                                                                  "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Appointment of Radiation Protection Officer","Proof of DOH appointments","Meet - Appointments in place\nNot Meet - No appointments                                                                                                                                                                                         "]
[]
[null,null,"Requirement: All criteria to be a MEET for further evaluation"]
[]
[null,null,"Evaluation performed by:"]

{"sheet":"Phase a - Functional evaluation","index":1,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":34,"rows_kept":39,"merged":[[6,2,6,23],[7,2,7,3],[7,4,7,5],[8,2,9,3],[11,2,12,3],[14,2,14,3],[16,2,26,2],[18,3,22,3],[23,3,26,3],[27,18,27,19],[27,22,27,23],[28,2,28,7],[28,18,28,19],[28,22,28,23],[29,2,29,7],[29,10,29,11],[29,14,29,15],[29,18,29,19],[29,22,29,23],[30,2,30,7],[30,10,30,11],[30,14,30,15],[31,2,31,7],[31,10,31,11],[31,14,31,15],[32,2,32,7],[32,10,32,11],[32,14,32,15],[33,2,33,7],[33,10,33,11],[33,12,33,13],[33,14,33,15],[38,2,41,8],[38,10,38,11],[38,14,38,15],[39,10,39,11],[39,14,39,15],[40,10,40,11],[40,14,40,15],[41,10,41,11],[41,14,41,15]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[{"$nulls":3},0,"Do Not Meet",{"$nulls":22},"MAX",null,"Not applicable",{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0.49,"d":"49%"},"NOT MEET","0-49"]
[{"$nulls":3},1,"Partial Meet (large gap) ",{"$nulls":22},{"v":0,"d":"0%"},0,"Do Not Meet",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},{"v":0.59,"d":"59%"},"PARTIAL MEET","50-59"]
[{"$nulls":3},2,"Partial Meet (small gap)",{"$nulls":22},{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},1,"Partial Meet",{"v":0.6,"d":"60%"},{"v":0.69,"d":"69%"},"PARTIAL MEET","60-69"]
[{"$nulls":3},3,"Meet",{"$nulls":22},{"v":0.75,"d":"75%"},2,"Partial Meet",{"v":0.7,"d":"70%"},100,"MEET","70-100"]
[{"$nulls":27},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},3,"Meet"]
[{"$nulls":27},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},"X","Not applicable"]
[null,null,"WCKBG2431SB                    Functional Evaluation Criteria    -   Provide Radiography services on an as and when required basis at Koeberg Operating Unit - Q3/L2 "]
[null,null,"Requirement",null,"Requirement",null,"Deliverable","Criteria",null,null," Rating","% Rating","% Score",null,"[ Supplier Name ] Response","Eskom Comments"]
[null,null,"1. COMPANY PROFILE",null,"Well balanced organization structure and an established name in the South African industry providing Radiography services",null,"Evidence of past experience","Meet - Quantitative and practical experience\nPartial Meet - Relevant reference of past experience\nNot Meet - No In service inspection experience\n",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Relevant references of past experience related to work scope",null,"Contactable references of previous work experiences related to the scope of the service. List of references included in returns.","Meet - > 15 RT ASME XI  Interventions\nPartial Meet -  5 -10 RT ASME XI  Interventions\nNot Meet - < 5 RT ASME XI  Interventions\n",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":3},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"$nulls":4},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":7},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"2. EXPERIENCE OF KEY PERSONNEL",null,"Certification + Work Experience (Level II for In-Service Inspections (ISI) and Level I for Balance of Plant (BOP)) \n\nNumber of RT technicians:\n\nRT Level II x 2 technicians \nRT Level I x 3 technicians",null,"Provide CVs' and valid certification for the specified  number of RT technicans\n\n","Meet -  3 x Level I and 2 x Level II\nPartial Meet -  2 x Level I and 1 x Level II\nNot Meet - 1 x Level I and 1 x Level II",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Multi- Sector Certifications (X-ray and Gamma-Ray)\n\nNumber of RT technicians:\n\nRT Level II x 2 technicians with ASME XI experience (ISI)\nRT Level I x 2 technicians with ASME XI experience (ISI)",null,"Provide CVs' and valid certification for the specified  number of multi sector technicans as specified","Meet -  2 x Level I and 2 x Level II\nPartial Meet -  1 x Level I and 1 x Level II\nNot Meet - 1 x Level I and 0 x Level II\n",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":3},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"$nulls":4},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[null,null,"3. TECHNICAL ADEQUACY TO PERFORM THE TASK ",null,"Engineering/NDT back-up and support on indication dis-positioning is available. \nRT Evaluators with ISI ASME XI experience (x 2)",null,"Provide evidence to confirm engineering / NDT  back-up support is available with ASME XI ISI experience as specified. ","Meet - Back-up support available immediately and 24/7 with ASME XI ISI\nPartial Meet -  Back-up support available with no ISI ASME XI experience\nNot Meet - No back-up support available\n",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":3},{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"$nulls":4},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[null,null,"4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM","4.1. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS)"," Demonstrate that the supplier Quality Management System (QMS) meets the requirements of ISO 9001:2015.",null,"The returnable is the retained or maintained  documented information for demonstrating criteria implementation. e.g. Internal or external audit report(s) demonstrating level of compliance wrt the requirements of ISO 9001: 2015 or, compliance matrix of suppliers QMS vs the requirements of ISO 9001: 2015.",null,{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":7},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"4.2. QUALITY PLANNING","Quality Control Plan (QCP) or Inspection and Test Plan (ITP)  or Quality Plan : A supplier document specifying the work or production activities to be performed  throughout the execution of the product realization works inclusive of test methods, procedures and acceptance criteria.  (DSG-318-087 Revision 2, Section 5.2.refers). ",null,"Returnable is an example of a QCP or Quality Project Plan for a similar service or product, identifying sequential operations and indicating inspection and test points (hold and/or witness points) and areas where reports are required .",null,{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":7},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"4.3. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY","\n\nDemonstrate management responsibility with respect to leadership: \n1: organisational structure to show roles,  reporting lines and authority.\n2: business plan, strategic direction, objectives, performance indicators and targets to show the level of performance is accomplished. \n",null,"The returnable is the retained or maintained  documented information for demonstrating criteria implementation.                                                                                                                    1: Organogram demonstrating key personnel with their roles                                                                                                                         2: KPI's and latest management review report.",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Demonstrate that change control process is managed in the organization on areas such as the company structure, staffing levels and resources that can adversely affect quality.",null,"The returnable is the retained or maintained documented information or records demonstrating criteria implementation, e.g. Changes have been planned and risk assessment performed to determine potential consequences and impact wrt the integrity of the QMS.",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Demonstrate that measures exist to control internal and external interfaces to the organisation and that adequate oversight measures are implemented.  ",null,"The returnable is the maintained documented information or method statement demonstrating criteria implementation.",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Demonstrate that measures exist to control externally provided processes, products and service as well as that adequate oversight measures have been implemented.  ",null,"The returnable is the maintained documented information or method statement demonstrating criteria implementation, e.g. process and criteria for the evaluation, selection, monitoring of performance, and re-evaluation of external providers as well as verification of purchased products and services.",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Demonstrate management commitment and accountability with respect to the achievement of QMS objectives.   Provide evidence  that the management review process ensures that the Quality Management System is suitable and effective with respect  to quality.",null,"The returnable is the latest management review report or proof that the requirement is addressed within the QMS",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"4.4. MONITORING","Demonstrate implementation of reviews to measure process effectiveness and opportunities for improvement with respect to  quality management. ",null,"The returnable is the retained (record) documented information demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. Internal audit or self assessment report or that the requirement is addressed within the QMS.",null,{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Demonstrate implementation of non-conformance, deviation and concession process, including disposition with provisions for customer notification and acceptance. ",null,"The returnable is the retained (record) or maintained documented information  demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. Non-conformance report.",null,{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Demonstrate that adequate measures are in place to ensure that audit results and corrective actions are being resolved satisfactorily and are closed out within agreed timeline. ",null,"The returnable is the retained (record) documented information   demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. A corrective action plan accomplished (closed-out) as scheduled. ",null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":3},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":3},{"v":1.0000000000000002,"d":"100%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"$nulls":4},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[]
[null,null,"Final Analysis"]
[null,null,"1. COMPANY PROFILE",{"$nulls":5},{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"2. EXPERIENCE OF KEY PERSONNEL",{"$nulls":5},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"3. TECHNICAL ADEQUACY TO PERFORM THE TASK ",{"$nulls":5},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"},{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"},null,null,{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[null,null,"4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM",{"$nulls":5},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"TOTAL",{"$nulls":5},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"NOT RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"RE-EVALUATE",{"$nulls":6},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"},null,null,{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[]
[null,null,"The scoring of the Functional Evaluation Criteria is conducted as follows:\n\nA supplier is given a score in each of the sub-categories. These sub-categories are requirements detailed in the specification or contract. Scores are allocated as follows:\n0 - 0% -    Does not meet \n1 - 50% -  Partial meet (Large gap) \n2 - 75% - Partial Meet (Small gap)\n3- 100% - Meet                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          \n\nThe overall score for Functional Evaluation Criteria is analysed as follows:\n0%     - 79.9%   - Not meet\n80%   - 100% - Meet",{"$nulls":7},"Does not meet"]