{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Phase a - Functional evaluation"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Phase a - Functional evaluation","index":0,"n_rows":43,"n_cols":24,"rows_kept":43,"merged":[[6,2,6,16],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,10,3],[11,2,12,3],[13,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[17,2,27,3],[19,4,23,4],[24,4,27,4],[29,2,29,6],[30,2,30,6],[30,11,30,12],[30,15,30,16],[31,2,31,6],[31,11,31,12],[31,15,31,16],[32,2,32,6],[32,11,32,12],[32,15,32,16],[33,2,33,6],[33,11,33,12],[33,15,33,16],[34,2,34,6],[34,11,34,12],[34,15,34,16],[35,2,35,6],[35,11,35,12],[35,13,35,14],[35,15,35,16],[40,2,43,9],[40,11,40,12],[40,15,40,16],[41,11,41,12],[41,15,41,16],[42,11,42,12],[42,15,42,16],[43,11,43,12],[43,15,43,16]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[{"$nulls":3},0,"Do Not Meet",{"$nulls":12},"MAX",null,"Not applicable",null,0.69,"NOT MEET","0-69"]
[{"$nulls":3},1,"Partial Meet (large gap) ",{"$nulls":12},0,0,"Does not meet ",0,0.79,"PARTIAL MEET","70-79"]
[{"$nulls":3},2,"Partial Meet (small gap)",{"$nulls":12},0.5,1,"Partial meet (Large gap) ",0.7,1,"MEET","80 - 100"]
[{"$nulls":3},3,"Meet",{"$nulls":12},0.75,2,"Partial Meet (Small gap)",0.8,110,"EXCEED","101-110"]
[{"$nulls":17},1,3,"Meet ",1.01]
[{"$nulls":17},1,"X","Not applicable"]
[null,null,"Functional Evaluation Criteria for Enquiry No: Construction of unit 1 PTR tank room bund walls and associated refurbishments."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Requirements",null,null,"Criteria ","Deliverables","Weighting",null," Rating","% Rating","% Score",null,"[ Supplier Name ] Response","Eskom Comments"]
[null,null,"1. COMPANY PROFILE",null,"Well balanced organisation structure","The structure needs to show the function areas from CEO/MD down to the site management and the roles each member plays in delivering the scope.","Provide organisational structure highlighting key positions and how they will interface with Employer","The structure needs to show the function areas from CEO/MD down to the site management and the roles each member plays in delivering the scope onsite.","Provide organisational structure highlighting key positions and how they will interface with Employer",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"Quantitative & practical experience of Company","The supplier needs to have more than 5 years experience in similar projects.","Quantitative & practical experience of Company","The supplier needs to have more than 5 years experience in similar projects (Concrete and refurbishment works).","Submit a portfolio of previous similar projects that demonstrates that the Tenderer has the appropriate abilities. Submit a list of contactable references that the Employer can contact during tender evaluations. ",{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":4},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,false,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"2. EXPERIENCE OF KEY PERSONNEL",null,"Appropriately qualified and skilled personnel.","CV's including references of previous experience of personnel who shall execute the scope","Appropriately qualified and skilled personnel","Key personnel shall be suitably experienced in similar works as defined in the scope.","CV's including references of previous experience of personnel who shall execute the scope consisting of at least the following people: Construction Manager(Registered with a professional body), Construction Supervisor, Project Manager(Registered with a professional body), Design Structural Engineer ( Registered as a professional), Safety Officer( Registered as a professional), and Semi-Skilled labours.",{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":4},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,false,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"3. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS",null,"Ability to provide a proposal that meets technical requirements of URS: NPM21/019. ","Technical specification showing that the device meets the criteria specified.",null,"Contractor needs to demonstrate understanding of the URS and show how they will undertake the works.","Contractor to submit a proposal (method statement) indicating how each aspect of the requirements will be executed onsite. ",{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":4},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,false,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"4. TIMELINES FOR EXECUTION",null,"Submission of a project plan","The project plan showing the delivery dates, analysis completion dates and turnaround time for report submission date.","Key milestone plan. Detailed proposed installation and retrieval plan. Plan from contract placement until delivery of the last Technical Report. The following proposed dates are provided and acceptable:\n- Contract Start and Completion dates.\n- Devices delivery dates from the Supplier to the Employer.\n- Devices retrieval from Controlled zones dates.\n- Exposed devices delivery dates to the Supplier's Laboratory.\n- Technical report first draft submission dates.\n- Technical report final copy submission dates. ","Contractor to submit project plan within the duration provided by Employer (start & finish date): Contractor to provide strategy around hold & witness points.","Submit a project plan showing key milestone deliverables and associated completion dates.",{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"TOTAL WEIGHTING",{"$nulls":4},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,false,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"5. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME",null,"1. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS)","The returnable is the supplier's  ISO 9001: 2015 certificate.","Demonstrate that the supplier Quality Management System (QMS) is certified to ISO 9001:2015.","Demonstrate that the supplier Quality Management System (QMS) is certified to ISO 9001:2015.","The returnable is the supplier's  ISO 9001: 2015 certificate.",{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"2. QUALITY PLANNING",null,null,"Quality Control Plan (QCP) or Inspection and Test Plan (ITP)  or Quality Plan : A supplier document specifying the work or production activities to be performed throughout the execution of the product realization works inclusive of test methods, procedures and acceptance criteria.  (DSG-318-087 Revision 2, Section 5 refers). ","Returnable is an example of a QCP or Quality Project Plan for a similar service or product, identifying sequential operations and indicating inspection and test points (hold and/or witness points) and areas where reports  are required .",{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"3. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY",null,null,"Demonstrate management responsibility with respect to leadership: \n1: organisational structure to show roles,  reporting lines and authority.\n2: business plan, strategic direction, objectives, performance indicators and targets to show the level of performance is accomplished. \n","The returnable is the retained or maintained  documented information for demonstrating criteria implementation.                                                                                                                    1: Organogram demonstrating key personnel with their roles                                                                                                                         2: KPI's and latest management review report.",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate that change control process is managed in the organization on areas such as the company structure, staffing levels and resources that can adversely affect quality.","The returnable is the retained documented information or records demonstrating criteria implementation, e.g. Changes have been planned and risk assessment performed to determine potential consequences and impact wrt the integrity of the QMS.",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate that measures exist to control internal and external interfaces to the organisation and that adequate oversight measures are implemented.  ","The returnable is the maintained documented information or method statement demonstrating criteria implementation.",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate that measures exist to control externally provided processes, products and service as well as that adequate oversight measures have been implemented.  ","The returnable is the maintained documented information or method statement demonstrating criteria implementation, e.g. process and criteria for the evaluation, selection, monitoring of performance, and re-evaluation of external providers as well as verification of purchased products and services.",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate management commitment and accountability with respect to the achievement of QMS objectives.   Provide evidence  that the management review process ensures that the Quality Management System is suitable and effective with respect  to quality.","The returnable is the latest management review report or extract of the management review report providing the results of the effectiveness review of the QMS",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":4},"4. MONITORING",null,null,"Demonstrate implementation of reviews to measure process effectiveness and opportunities for improvement with respect to quality management. ","The returnable is the retained (record) documented information demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. Internal audit or self assessment report or Method Statement thereof .",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate implementation of non-conformance, deviation and concession process, including disposition with provisions for customer notification and acceptance. ","The returnable is the retained (record) documented information  demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. Non-conformance report.",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":7},"Demonstrate that adequate measures are in place to ensure that audit results and corrective actions are being resolved satisfactorily and are closed out within agreed timeline. ","The returnable is the retained (record) documented information   demonstrating criteria implementation. E.g. A corrective action plan accomplished (closed-out) as scheduled or method Statement thereof . ",{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},null,null,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0%"}]
[{"$nulls":9},{"v":1.0000000000000002,"d":"100%"},null,false,{"v":0,"d":"0%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[]
[null,null,"Final Analysis"]
[null,null,"1. COMPANY PROFILE",{"$nulls":6},{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"2. EXPERIENCE OF KEY PERSONNEL",{"$nulls":6},{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"3. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS",{"$nulls":6},{"v":0.25,"d":"25%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"4. TIMELINES FOR EXECUTION",{"$nulls":6},{"v":0.2,"d":"20%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"5. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME",{"$nulls":6},{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[null,null,"TOTAL",{"$nulls":6},{"v":1,"d":"100%"},null,{"v":0,"d":"0.0%"}]
[{"$nulls":3},"RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"NOT RECOMMENDED"]
[{"$nulls":3},"RE-EVALUATE",{"$nulls":7},{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"},null,null,{"$error":"#REF!"},{"$error":"#REF!"}]
[]
[null,null,"The scoring of the Quality Evaluation Criteria is conducted as follows:\nA supplier is given a score in each of the sub-categories. These sub-categories are requirements detailed in the specification or contract. Scores are allocated as follows:\n0 - 0% -    Does not meet \n1 - 50% -  Partial meet (Large gap) \n2 - 75% - Partial Meet (Small gap)\n3- 100% - Meet                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          The overall score for functionality criteria is  analysed as follows:\n0%     - 79%   - Does not meet\n80%   - 100% - Meet\n                                                                                   ",{"$nulls":8},"NOT MEET",{"$nulls":3},"COMPILER TECHNICAL : W Tengeni (Project Leader) NPM\n\nSIGNATURE:"]
[{"$nulls":15},"COMPILER QUALITY: S Brown PQE\n\nSIGNATURE:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  "]
[{"$nulls":15},"REVIEWER: S Pemba (MANAGER) NPM\n\nSIGNATURE:",{"$nulls":5},"`"]