{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":4,"sheets":["Phase 1 criteria","Phase 2 criteria","Phase 1 scores Name","Phase 2 scores Name"],"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Phase 1 criteria","index":0,"n_rows":63,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":63,"merged":[[4,1,9,1],[4,2,9,2],[4,3,9,3],[4,4,9,4],[4,5,9,5],[4,6,9,6],[4,7,9,7],[5,8,9,8],[11,1,14,1],[11,2,14,2],[11,3,11,8],[12,3,12,8],[13,3,13,8],[19,1,24,1],[19,2,24,2],[26,1,29,1],[26,2,29,2],[34,1,39,1],[34,2,39,2],[37,8,39,8],[41,1,44,1],[41,2,44,2],[49,1,52,1],[49,2,52,2],[53,1,53,8],[54,1,57,1],[54,2,57,2],[62,1,64,8]]}
[]
[null,"Lead Self: Personal Mastery - Technical Criteria",null,null,"Phase 1"]
[null,"%","Evaluation criteria","Description","Not meeting minimum","Less than acceptable","Acceptable","More than acceptable","Exceeding expectations"]
[{"$nulls":4},"(0 points)","(1-10 points)","(11-19 points)","(20-29 points)","(30-40 points)"]
[null,{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},"Design and Development of Lead self content","Evidence that the service provider is competent in the field of designing Lead Self solutions. Service provider to showcase:\n•\tAlignment to Eskom leadership development philosophy\n•\tSolution is experiential in nature\n•\tAbility to develop fresh content\n•\tAbility to focus on practical application\nService provider to confirm all the different content pieces that will be included in the programme","No evidence of requisite competence","•\tThe evidence of Lead Self content is vague and does not respond to the intent as defined in the scope of work. \n•\tContent not packaged in a logical end to end learning and development solution manner\n•\tDevelopment solution is only  50%  aligned with Eskom’s leadership development philosophy ","•\tEvidence of theoretically sound, comprehensive  ‘Lead Self’ content as defined in the scope of work\n•\tContent packaged in a logical end to end learning and development solution\n•\tDevelopment solution is aligned with Eskom’s leadership development philosophy ","• As with previous scale, with additional evidence that content is aligned to the reality of: \n•\tVUCA (Volatile/ Uncertain/ Complex/ Ambiguous) \nand BANI (Brittle, Anxious, Non-linear and Incomprehensible)continuously changing environment"]
[{"$nulls":8},"As with previous scale, with additional elements of creativity to enhance application of learning"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Evaluators score","M de Klerk"]
[{"$nulls":3},"W Labuschagne"]
[{"$nulls":3},"M Jensen"]
[]
[null,null,"Consensus score","Independent Reviewer:               G Walters"]
[]
[null,"%","Evaluation criteria","Description","Not meeting minimum","Less than acceptable","Acceptable","More than acceptable","Exceeding expectations"]
[{"$nulls":4},"(0 points)","(1-10 points)","(11-19 points)","(20-29 points)","(30-40 points)"]
[null,{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},"Facilitation and inclusion of number of quality facilitators","•Evidence that the service provider is competent in the delivery of Lead Self solutions."]
[{"$nulls":3},"•Service provider to showcase quality and quantity of facilitators","No evidence of requisite competence demonstrated in response","Minimal competence noted, which link to vague, formal response to scope of work ","Minimum of 5 competent facilitators with requisite knowledge and experience in facilitating Lead Self solutions","As with previous scale, with additional evidence of:","As with the previous scale, but including:"]
[{"$nulls":7},"•the embodiment of Lead Self concepts in the facilitator’s own growth journey ","•more sophisticated facilitation applications to enhance the learning experience, digital tools to drive engagement"]
[{"$nulls":7},"• Material digitally friendly","•experience in individual and group coaching "]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Evaluators score","M de Klerk"]
[{"$nulls":3},"W Labuschagne"]
[{"$nulls":3},"M Jensen"]
[]
[null,null,"Consensus score","Independent Reviewer:              G Walters"]
[]
[null,"%","Evaluation criteria","Description","Not meeting minimum","Less than acceptable","Acceptable","More than acceptable","Exceeding expectations"]
[{"$nulls":4},"(0 points)","(1-10 points)","(11-19 points)","(20-29 points)","(30-40 points)"]
[null,{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},"Flexibility to adapt content and process to fit the request\n","Evidence that the programme content and delivery can have dual functionality:","No evidence of dual offering","Some opportunities presented","Clear indication of process for integration or stand-alone solution","Clear indication of process for dual purpose with evidence of past delivery in this format","Innovative proposal for seamless programme architectures and independent solutions"]
[{"$nulls":3},"•Integration within current  architectures on middle management and supervisory level "]
[{"$nulls":3},"•Be an end-to-end stand-alone offering"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Evaluator score","M de Klerk"]
[{"$nulls":3},"W Labuschagne"]
[{"$nulls":3},"M Jensen"]
[]
[null,null,"Consensus score","Independent Reviewer:              G Walters"]
[]
[null,"%","Evaluation criteria","Description","Not meeting minimum","Less than acceptable","Acceptable","More than acceptable","Exceeding expectations"]
[{"$nulls":4},"(0 points)","(1-10 points)","(11-19 points)","(20-29 points)","(30-40 points)"]
[null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},"Programme management and Logistics"," Evidence that the service provider has a robust administrative process"," No evidence of an administrative process"," Some evidence of an administrative process"," Evidence of a robust (strong, resilient, and effective under a wide range of conditions) administrative process"," Clear evidence of an advanced administrative process to mirror the internal Eskom resources and process"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Evaluator score","M de Klerk"]
[{"$nulls":3},"W Labuschagne"]
[{"$nulls":3},"M Jensen"]
[]
[null,null,"Consensus score","Independent Reviewer:               G Walters"]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":8},"Overall score "]
[null,"The threshold on the technical evaluation criteria is 80%. Suppliers would be deemed technically unacceptable if they score less and will thus not be evaluated further on Price."]

{"sheet":"Phase 2 criteria","index":1,"n_rows":63,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":63,"merged":[[4,1,9,1],[4,2,9,2],[4,3,9,3],[4,4,9,4],[4,5,9,5],[4,6,9,6],[4,7,9,7],[5,8,9,8],[11,1,14,1],[11,2,14,2],[11,3,11,8],[12,3,12,8],[13,3,13,8],[19,1,24,1],[19,2,24,2],[26,1,29,1],[26,2,29,2],[34,1,39,1],[34,2,39,2],[37,8,39,8],[41,1,44,1],[41,2,44,2],[49,1,52,1],[49,2,52,2],[53,1,53,8],[54,1,57,1],[54,2,57,2],[62,1,64,8]]}
[]
[null,"Lead Self: Personal Mastery - Technical Criteria",null,null,"Phase 1"]
[null,"%","Evaluation criteria","Description","Not meeting minimum","Less than acceptable","Acceptable","More than acceptable","Exceeding expectations"]
[{"$nulls":4},"(0 points)","(1-10 points)","(11-19 points)","(20-29 points)","(30-40 points)"]
[null,{"v":0.5,"d":"50%"},"Design and Development of Lead self content","Evidence that the service provider is competent in the field of designing Lead Self solutions. Service provider to showcase:\n•\tAlignment to Eskom leadership development philosophy\n•\tSolution is experiential in nature\n•\tAbility to develop fresh content\n•\tAbility to focus on practical application\nService provider to confirm all the different content pieces that will be included in the programme","No evidence of requisite competence","•\tThe evidence of Lead Self content is vague and does not respond to the intent as defined in the scope of work. \n•\tContent not packaged in a logical end to end learning and development solution manner\n•\tDevelopment solution is only  50%  aligned with Eskom’s leadership development philosophy ","•\tEvidence of theoretically sound, comprehensive  ‘Lead Self’ content as defined in the scope of work\n•\tContent packaged in a logical end to end learning and development solution\n•\tDevelopment solution is aligned with Eskom’s leadership development philosophy ","• As with previous scale, with additional evidence that content is aligned to the reality of: \n•\tVUCA (Volatile/ Uncertain/ Complex/ Ambiguous) \nand BANI (Brittle, Anxious, Non-linear and Incomprehensible)continuously changing environment"]
[{"$nulls":8},"As with previous scale, with additional elements of creativity to enhance application of learning"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Evaluators score","M de Klerk"]
[{"$nulls":3},"W Labuschagne"]
[{"$nulls":3},"M Jensen"]
[]
[null,null,"Consensus score","Independent Reviewer:               G Walters"]
[]
[null,"%","Evaluation criteria","Description","Not meeting minimum","Less than acceptable","Acceptable","More than acceptable","Exceeding expectations"]
[{"$nulls":4},"(0 points)","(1-10 points)","(11-19 points)","(20-29 points)","(30-40 points)"]
[null,{"v":0.3,"d":"30%"},"Facilitation and inclusion of number of quality facilitators","•Evidence that the service provider is competent in the delivery of Lead Self solutions."]
[{"$nulls":3},"•Service provider to showcase quality and quantity of facilitators","No evidence of requisite competence demonstrated in response","Minimal competence noted, which link to vague, formal response to scope of work ","Minimum of 5 competent facilitators with requisite knowledge and experience in facilitating Lead Self solutions","As with previous scale, with additional evidence of:","As with the previous scale, but including:"]
[{"$nulls":7},"•the embodiment of Lead Self concepts in the facilitator’s own growth journey ","•more sophisticated facilitation applications to enhance the learning experience, digital tools to drive engagement"]
[{"$nulls":7},"• Material digitally friendly","•experience in individual and group coaching "]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Evaluators score","M de Klerk"]
[{"$nulls":3},"W Labuschagne"]
[{"$nulls":3},"M Jensen"]
[]
[null,null,"Consensus score","Independent Reviewer:              G Walters"]
[]
[null,"%","Evaluation criteria","Description","Not meeting minimum","Less than acceptable","Acceptable","More than acceptable","Exceeding expectations"]
[{"$nulls":4},"(0 points)","(1-10 points)","(11-19 points)","(20-29 points)","(30-40 points)"]
[null,{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},"Flexibility to adapt content and process to fit the request\n","Evidence that the programme content and delivery can have dual functionality:","No evidence of dual offering","Some opportunities presented","Clear indication of process for integration or stand-alone solution","Clear indication of process for dual purpose with evidence of past delivery in this format","Innovative proposal for seamless programme architectures and independent solutions"]
[{"$nulls":3},"•Integration within current  architectures on middle management and supervisory level "]
[{"$nulls":3},"•Be an end-to-end stand-alone offering"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Evaluator score","M de Klerk"]
[{"$nulls":3},"W Labuschagne"]
[{"$nulls":3},"M Jensen"]
[]
[null,null,"Consensus score","Independent Reviewer:              G Walters"]
[]
[null,"%","Evaluation criteria","Description","Not meeting minimum","Less than acceptable","Acceptable","More than acceptable","Exceeding expectations"]
[{"$nulls":4},"(0 points)","(1-10 points)","(11-19 points)","(20-29 points)","(30-40 points)"]
[null,{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"},"Programme management and Logistics"," Evidence that the service provider has a robust administrative process"," No evidence of an administrative process"," Some evidence of an administrative process"," Evidence of a robust (strong, resilient, and effective under a wide range of conditions) administrative process"," Clear evidence of an advanced administrative process to mirror the internal Eskom resources and process"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Evaluator score","M de Klerk"]
[{"$nulls":3},"W Labuschagne"]
[{"$nulls":3},"M Jensen"]
[]
[null,null,"Consensus score","Independent Reviewer:               G Walters"]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":8},"Overall score "]
[null,"The threshold on the technical evaluation criteria is 80%. Suppliers would be deemed technically unacceptable if they score less and will thus not be evaluated further on Price."]

{"sheet":"Phase 1 scores Name","index":2,"n_rows":32,"n_cols":16,"rows_kept":32,"merged":[[0,1,0,14],[1,0,2,0],[1,1,2,1],[7,1,7,14],[8,0,9,0],[8,1,9,1],[14,0,14,1],[17,0,17,2]]}
[null,"Insert your score (out of 40) per evaluation criteria and per Supplier - Phase 1"]
["%","Evaluation criteria ","Supplier 01","Supplier 02","Supplier 03","Supplier 04","Supplier 05","Supplier 06","Supplier 07","Supplier 08","Supplier 09","Supplier 10","Supplier 11","Supplier 12","Supplier 13","Supplier 14"]
[]
[50,"Design and Development of Lead self content "]
[30,"Facilitation and inclusion of number of quality facilitators"]
[15,"Flexibility to adapt content and process to fit the request"]
[5,"Programme management and Logistics"]
[null,"Calculation (this will calculate from your raw data)"]
["%","Evaluation criteria ","Supplier 01","Supplier 02","Supplier 03","Supplier 04","Supplier 05","Supplier 06","Supplier 07","Supplier 08","Supplier 09","Supplier 10","Supplier 11","Supplier 12","Supplier 13","Supplier 14"]
[]
[50,"Criteria 1",{"$f":"C4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"D4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"E4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"F4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"G4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"H4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"I4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"J4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"K4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"L4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"M4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"N4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"O4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"P4/40*A4","v":0}]
[30,"Criteria 2",{"$f":"C5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"D5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"E5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"F5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"G5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"H5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"I5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"J5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"K5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"L5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"M5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"N5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"O5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"P5/40*A5","v":0}]
[15,"Criteria 3",{"$f":"C6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"D6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"E6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"F6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"G6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"H6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"I6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"J6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"K6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"L6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"M6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"N6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"O6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"P6/40*A6","v":0}]
[5,"Criteria 4",{"$f":"C7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"D7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"E7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"F7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"G7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"H7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"I7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"J7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"K7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"L7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"M7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"N7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"O7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"P7/40*A7","v":0}]
["Total",null,{"$f":"SUM(C11:C14)","v":0},0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,{"$f":"SUM(P11:P14)","v":0}]
[]
[]
["Comments per tenderer: "]
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]

{"sheet":"Phase 2 scores Name","index":3,"n_rows":32,"n_cols":16,"rows_kept":32,"merged":[[0,1,0,14],[1,0,2,0],[1,1,2,1],[7,1,7,14],[8,0,9,0],[8,1,9,1],[14,0,14,1],[17,0,17,2]]}
[null,"Insert your score (out of 40) per evaluation criteria and per Supplier - Phase 1"]
["%","Evaluation criteria ","Supplier 01","Supplier 02","Supplier 03","Supplier 04","Supplier 05","Supplier 06","Supplier 07","Supplier 08","Supplier 09","Supplier 10","Supplier 11","Supplier 12","Supplier 13","Supplier 14"]
[]
[50,"Design and Development of Lead self content "]
[30,"Facilitation and inclusion of number of quality facilitators"]
[15,"Flexibility to adapt content and process to fit the request"]
[5,"Programme management and Logistics"]
[null,"Calculation (this will calculate from your raw data)"]
["%","Evaluation criteria ","Supplier 01","Supplier 02","Supplier 03","Supplier 04","Supplier 05","Supplier 06","Supplier 07","Supplier 08","Supplier 09","Supplier 10","Supplier 11","Supplier 12","Supplier 13","Supplier 14"]
[]
[50,"Criteria 1",{"$f":"C4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"D4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"E4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"F4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"G4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"H4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"I4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"J4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"K4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"L4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"M4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"N4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"O4/40*A4","v":0},{"$f":"P4/40*A4","v":0}]
[30,"Criteria 2",{"$f":"C5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"D5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"E5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"F5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"G5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"H5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"I5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"J5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"K5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"L5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"M5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"N5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"O5/40*A5","v":0},{"$f":"P5/40*A5","v":0}]
[15,"Criteria 3",{"$f":"C6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"D6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"E6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"F6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"G6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"H6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"I6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"J6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"K6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"L6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"M6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"N6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"O6/40*A6","v":0},{"$f":"P6/40*A6","v":0}]
[5,"Criteria 4",{"$f":"C7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"D7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"E7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"F7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"G7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"H7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"I7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"J7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"K7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"L7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"M7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"N7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"O7/40*A7","v":0},{"$f":"P7/40*A7","v":0}]
["Total",null,{"$f":"SUM(C11:C14)","v":0},0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,{"$f":"SUM(P11:P14)","v":0}]
[]
[]
["Comments per tenderer: "]
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]